The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making the most of new genetic risk factors – genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Identified genetic associations mirror the pattern and nature seen in autoimmune diseases with the combination of a significant number of genetic associations with low OR for risk, typically in genes regulating the magnitude and nature of the immune response.
“Identified genetic associations mirror the pattern and nature seen in autoimmune diseases with the combination of a significant number of genetic associations with low OR for risk, typically in genes regulating the magnitude and nature of the immune response.55”
From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Farh, 2015, Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants, Nature, 518, 337, 10.1038/nature13835 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, 2012, Dense fine-mapping study identifies new susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis, Nat Genet, 44, 1137, 10.1038/ng.2395 · DOI · Paper page
- Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, 2015, Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes, Nature, 518, 317, 10.1038/nature14248 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hirschfield, G. M., Dyson, J. K., Alexander, G. J. M., Chapman, M. H., Collier, J., Hübscher, S., Patanwala, I., Pereira, S. P., Thain, C., Thorburn, D., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315259 · Cited by 362
Self-citationThe challenges of primary biliary cholangitis: What is new and what needs to be done
Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli, B., Mieli-Vergani, G., Vergani, D., Vierling, J. M., Adams, D., Alpini, G., Banales, J. M., Beuers, U., Björnsson, E., Bowlus, C., et al. (2019) · Journal of Autoimmunity · doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102328 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mells, G. F., & Hirschfield, G. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mells, G.F.
- Venue
- Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 408-411
- ISSN
- 2210-7401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2221156492
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-SGCL9-Mells)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- autoimmune disease, genetic risk factors, non-coding variants, 3D chromatin interactions, trans-regulation, transcriptional dysregulation, multi-omics integration
- MeSH terms
- Autoimmune Diseases, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Risk Factors, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review