Cited by 82Sleep and related disordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Use of patient-reported sleep measures in clinical trials of pain treatment: A literature review and synthesis of current sleep measures and a conceptual model of sleep disturbance in pain

Cole, Jason C., Dubois, Dominique, Kosinski, Mark·2007·Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Despite the strong relationship between sleep-related problems and chronic pain, no measures have been developed specifically for the assessment of sleep disorders in patients with chronic pain. In addition, there are no explicit guidelines to suggest which of the existing self-reported measures of sleep disorders best capture the sleep disorders pertinent to patients with chronic pain. Objective The objective of this paper was to examine the fit between current sleep measures that capture areas of sleep disturbance important to patients with pain and to develop a conceptual model of sleep disturbance in these patients. Methods A conceptual framework describing the associations between patient-reported experiences of pain and sleep problems was constructed based on a review of the published peer-reviewed literature. The online OVID/MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for articles in English published between 1995 and June 2007. Additional relevant material was identified by searching the reference lists of systematic review articles. The literature review and conceptual framework were used to determine the sleep domains that are most relevant to the study of patients with chronic pain. The patient-reported sleep measures most frequently used in pain clinical trials were identified and characterized psychometrically, along with how well they captured the relevant sleep domains. Results Fourteen pain trials were identified in which sleep instruments were used.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.005

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cole, J. C., Dubois, D., & Kosinski, M.
Affiliations
Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
Corresponding author
Cole, Jason C.
Venue
Clinical Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
2580-2588
ISSN
0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981207099
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
sleep disorders, chronic pain, patient-reported outcomes, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, psychometric properties, factor structure
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Pain, Sleep Wake Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review