Cited by 57Cancer survivorship and careLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Long-term lung cancer survivors have permanently decreased quality of life after surgery

Rauma, Ville, Sintonen, Harri, Räsänen, Jari V., Salo, Jarmo A., Ilonen, Ilkka K.·2015·Clinical Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background Retrospective evaluation of the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among survivors after non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery.Patients and methods A total of 586 patients underwent surgery for NSCLC in Helsinki University Central Hospital between January 2000 and June 2009. Two validated quality-of-life questionnaires, the 15D and the EORTC QLQ-C30 with its lung cancer-specific module, QLQ-LC13, were sent to the 276 patients alive in June 2011. Response rate was 83.3%. Results of the 15D were compared with those of an age- and gender-standardized general population.Results Median follow-up was 5 years. Compared with a general population, our patients had a significantly lower 15D total score, representing their total HRQoL and scores for dimensions of mobility, breathing, usual activities, depression, distress, and vitality. The patients, however, scored significantly higher on vision, hearing, and mental function.Conclusions NSCLC survivors may suffer postoperatively from permanently reduced long-term HRQoL compared to an age- and gender-matched general population. This is essential patient information as more patients are surviving longer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cllc.2014.08.004

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rauma, V., Sintonen, H., Räsänen, J. V., Salo, J. A., & Ilonen, I. K.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Ilonen, Ilkka K.
Venue
Clinical Lung Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
40-45
ISSN
1525-7304 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030517068
Cited by
57
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Lung Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, lung cancer surgery, health-related quality of life, long-term survivors, postoperative outcomes, 15D, EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13, mobility (physical function), breathing, depression, vitality
MeSH terms
Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Depression, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Survivors, Thoracic Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review