Effect of Coexisting KRAS and TP53 Mutations in Patients Treated With Chemotherapy for Non–small-cell Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background KRAS and TP53 are common mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation Biological Program group found adjuvant chemotherapy to be deleterious in patients with coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations.Patients and methods To validate these results, patients with NSCLC tested for KRAS and TP53 mutations and receiving chemotherapy for any stage NSCLC were selected. Mutation status was analyzed using next generation sequencing (Illumina) or multiplex recurrent mutation detection (MassARRAY, Agena Biosciences) assays, and was correlated with clinical and demographic data. Disease-free (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) was the main endpoint, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint.Results Among 218 patients, 28 had coexisting KRAS/TP53 mutations, 77 TP53, 37 KRAS, 76 had neither KRAS nor TP53 mutation (WT/WT). There was no DFS/PFS difference for the KRAS/TP53 group versus all others among 99 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-2.44; P = .57), 27 stage III patients who received chemo-radiation (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32-2.38; P = .8), and 63 patients who received palliative chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.31-1.48; P = .33). OS was longer in the WT/WT group compared with any other group (KRAS: HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .043; TP53: HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.3-3.61; P = .0028; KRAS/TP53: HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .026). No OS difference was seen for KRAS/TP53 compared with the other groups (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.75-2.13; P = .38).Conclusions There was no significant difference in DFS/PFS between the 4 groups. However, OS was longer for patients with TP53 and KRAS wild-type NSCLC who received chemotherapy for any stage compared with patients with KRAS, TP53 mutation, or double mutant tumors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
p53 co-mutations were not prognostic or predictive in multiple analyses.
“Unexpectedly, p53 co-mutations were not prognostic or predictive in multiple analyses [56–58].”
From Drugging KRAS: Current perspectives and state-of-art review (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
Cites
Sequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
Mapping the Hallmarks of Lung Adenocarcinoma with Massively Parallel Sequencing
Imielinski, M., Berger, A. H., Hammerman, P. S., Hernandez, B., Pugh, T. J., Hodis, E., Cho, J., Suh, J., Capelletti, M., Sivachenko, A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.029 · Cited by 1,789 · see citing works
Arbour, K. C., Jordan, E., Kim, H. R., Dienstag, J., Yu, H. A., Sanchez-Vega, F., Lito, P., Berger, M., Solit, D. B., Hellmann, M., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1841 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Le Calvez, F., Mukeria, A., Hunt, J. D., Kelm, O., Hung, R. J., Tanière, P., Brennan, P., Boffetta, P., Zaridze, D. G., & Hainaut, P. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0551 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Shepherd, F. A., Lacas, B., Le Teuff, G., Hainaut, P., Jänne, P. A., Pignon, J.-P., Le Chevalier, T., Seymour, L., Douillard, J.-Y., Graziano, S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.71.2893 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drugging KRAS: Current perspectives and state-of-art review
Parikh, K., Banna, G., Liu, S. V., Friedlaender, A., Desai, A., Subbiah, V., & Addeo, A. (2022) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-022-01375-4 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tomasini, P., Mascaux, C., Jao, K., Labbe, C., Kamel-Reid, S., Stockley, T., Hwang, D. M., Leighl, N. B., Liu, G., Bradbury, P. A., Pintilie, M., Tsao, M.-S., & Shepherd, F. A.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Tomasini, Pascale
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Lung Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e338-e345
- ISSN
- 1525-7304 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904270864
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Lung Cancer (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Keywords
- non-small cell lung cancer, KRAS mutation, TP53 mutation, co-occurring mutations, adjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival, prognostic factors, stage III NSCLC, next-generation sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Survival Analysis, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Biomarkers, Pharmacological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review