Cited by 273Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research StudiesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

TP53 and KRAS Mutation Load and Types in Lung Cancers in Relation to Tobacco Smoke: Distinct Patterns in Never, Former, and Current Smokers

Open access
Le Calvez, Florence, Mukeria, Anush, Hunt, Jay D., Kelm, Olaf, Hung, Rayjean J., Tanière, Philippe, Brennan, Paul, Boffetta, Paolo +2 more·2005·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

TP53 mutations are common in lung cancers of smokers, with high prevalence of G:C-to-T:A transversions generally interpreted as mutagen fingerprints of tobacco smoke. In this study, TP53 (exons 5-9) and KRAS (codon 12) were analyzed in primary lung tumors of never (n = 40), former (n = 27), and current smokers (n = 64; mainly heavy smokers). Expression of p53, cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2), and nitrotyrosine (N-Tyr), a marker of protein damage by nitric oxide, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. TP53 mutations were detected in 47.5% never, 55.6% former, and 77.4% current smokers. The relative risk for mutation increased with tobacco consumption (Plinear trend < 0.0001). G:C-to-T:A transversions (P = 0.06, current versus never smokers) and A:T-to-G:C transitions (P = 0.03, former versus never smokers) were consistently associated with smoking. In contrast, G:C-to-A:T transitions were associated with never smoking (P = 0.02). About half of mutations in current smokers fell within a particular domain of p53 protein, suggesting a common structural effect. KRAS mutations, detected in 20 of 131 (15.3%) cases, were rare in squamous cell carcinoma compared with adenocarcinoma [relative risk (RR), 0.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.07-1] and were more frequent in former smokers than in other categories. No significant differences in Cox-2 expression were found between ever and never smokers. However, high levels of N-Tyr were more common in never than ever smokers (RR, 10; 95% CI, 1.6-50). These results support the notion that lung tumorigenesis proceeds through different molecular mechanisms according to smoking status. In never smokers, accumulation of N-Tyr suggests an etiology involving severe inflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0551

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • KRAS mutations, especially KRASG12C and KRASG12V, are strongly associated with smoking.

    “Unlike other clinically actionable genomic alterations found in NSCLCs (such as EGFR and ALK aberrations), KRAS mutations, particularly KRASG12C and KRASG12V, are strongly associated with smoking29–31.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cooper CA, Carby FA, Bubb VJ, Lamb D, Kerr KM, Wyllie AH. The pattern of K-ras mutation in pulmonary adenocarcinoma defines a new pathway of tumour development in the human lung. J Pathol 1997;181: 401-4.
  2. Pfeifer GP, Denissenko MF, Olivier M, Tretyakova N, Hecht SS, Hainaut P. Tobacco smoke carcinogens, DNA damage and p53 mutations in smoking-associated cancers. Oncogene 2002;21:7435-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le Calvez, F., Mukeria, A., Hunt, J. D., Kelm, O., Hung, R. J., Tanière, P., Brennan, P., Boffetta, P., Zaridze, D. G., & Hainaut, P.
Affiliations
  • 1IARC, Lyon, France;
  • Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin (RU)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • 4Department of Cellular Pathology, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Egbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2005-06-15
Volume
65
Issue
12
Pages
5076-5083
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2149459560
Cited by
273
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 27
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (IC15-CT96-0313)
  • National Institutes of Health (5k01es000358-03)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (K01‐ES00358)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
TP53 mutation, KRAS mutation, lung cancer, smoking, mutation patterns, G:C to T:A transversions, cyclooxygenase-2, nitrotyrosine, nitric oxide, inflammation, never smokers, former smokers, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, lung carcinogenesis
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Membrane Proteins, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthases, Genes, ras, Smoking, Tyrosine, Genes, p53, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cyclooxygenase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review