Cited by 46Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

Treatment Options for Patients With Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Open access
Dimopoulos, Meletios-Athanasios, Richardson, Paul, Lonial, Sagar·2022·Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of treatment options available for multiple myeloma, relapse is still inevitable and there remains a critical unmet need for treatments for patients with late-stage, highly refractory disease. In this review, we discuss currently approved treatment options for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, with a focus on the optimal management of patients with MM refractory to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and in some cases, daratumumab or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Data from recent clinical trials of immunomodulatory agents (pomalidomide), proteasome inhibitors (PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib), monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab, daratumumab, and isatuximab), and other novel therapies (including panobinostat-based therapy) are summarized. We also provide potential therapeutic strategies for patients according to different treatment histories, and include case studies to illustrate the practical use of various treatment options in a clinical setting. Regimens containing pomalidomide, elotuzumab, next-generation PIs, panobinostat, or selinexor may provide effective treatment options in patients with triple-refractory disease. The choice of agents used, and combinations thereof should be individualized as well as strategically planned from early- to late-stage relapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clml.2022.01.011

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimopoulos, M.-A., Richardson, P., & Lonial, S.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Dimopoulos, Meletios-Athanasios
Venue
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
460-473
ISSN
2152-2650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206792247
Cited by
46
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, heavily pretreated patients, lenalidomide-refractory disease, bortezomib-refractory disease, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, pomalidomide, elotuzumab, daratumumab, isatuximab, carfilzomib, ixazomib, panobinostat, selinexor, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, treatment sequencing, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Panobinostat, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review