Cited by 19Nutritional Studies and DietDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseNuts composition and effects

Relationship between intake of fruit separately from vegetables and triglycerides - A meta-analysis

Kodama, Satoru, Horikawa, Chika, Fujihara, Kazuya, Ishii, Dai, Hatta, Mariko, Takeda, Yasunaga, Kitazawa, Masaru, Matsubayashi, Yasuhiro +4 more·2018·Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Abstract

Background & aims High intake of fruit and vegetables is recommended for cardiovascular health. However, there have been persistent beliefs that fruits having high concentrations of fructose elevate the level of triglycerides (TG) in blood unlike vegetables. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the relationship between fruit intake and TG or hypertriglyceridemia. Methods Electronic literature searches were conducted for observational studies that investigated the relationship between fruit intake and hypertriglyceridemia or intervention studies that investigated the effect of increasing fruit intake on TG. Each effect size was pooled with an inverse-variance method. Results Five cross-sectional studies and only 2 intervention studies were eligible. The pooled odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of the 5 cross-sectional studies for the highest vs. the lowest fruit intake category was 0.79 (0.72-0.87). In these studies, the pooled OR for the highest vs. the lowest vegetable intake category was not significant (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, (0.82-1.03)). A linear dose-response association was observed between increases in fruit intake and ORs for hypertriglyceridemia; the OR (95% CI) for an incrementally increased intake of fruit by 1 serving/day was 0.91 (0.84-0.98). Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that high intake of fruit but not vegetables is inversely associated with hypertriglyceridemia. More trials are needed to clarify whether increasing fruit intake would reduce th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.07.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kodama, S., Horikawa, C., Fujihara, K., Ishii, D., Hatta, M., Takeda, Y., Kitazawa, M., Matsubayashi, Y., Shimano, H., Kato, K., Tanaka, S., & Sone, H.
Affiliations
  • Niigata University (JP)
  • University of Niigata Prefecture (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Kodama, Satoru
Venue
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
27
Pages
53-58
ISSN
2405-4577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884310571
Cited by
19
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition ESPEN (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (ID17900899, ID16671647)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
Keywords
fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, triglycerides, hypertriglyceridemia, fructose, dietary fat, cardiovascular health, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Cross-Sectional Studies, Feeding Behavior, Fruit, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Triglycerides, Vegetables, Hypertriglyceridemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review