Insufficient fluid and energy intake in hospitalised patients with hip fracture. A prospective randomised study of 80 patients
Abstract
Aims Evaluate nutritional status and fluid and energy intake during the first ten days of hospitalisation in a selection of otherwise healthy patients with a hip fracture. Methods A prospective randomised controlled study of 80 patients. Nutritional status was assessed at inclusion. The energy and fluid intake was recorded and calculated daily whilst hospitalised. All patients were given ordinary hospital food and beverage. In the treatment group (n = 40) patients also received intraveneous supplementary nutrition (1000 kcal/day) for three days followed by oral supplementary nutrition (400 kcal/day) for seven days or until discharge. Results One third of patients were classified as malnourished in both groups. The average daily fluid intake/patient was 1300 ml in the control group compared to 1856 ml in the treatment group (P Conclusions Malnutrition is common even in a selection of healthy patients with hip fractures. During hospital stay the fluid and energy intake was considerably lower than that needed in the control group. Supplementary nutritional intake for ten days increased the total fluid and energy intake in the treatment group to near needed levels.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One RCT of low quality evaluated three days of perioperative peripheral parenteral nutrition followed by seven days of ONS compared with standard care in 80 patients with a fractured hip.
“182) included one RCT of low quality that evaluated three days of perioperative peripheral PN followed by seven days of ONS compared with standard care in 80 patients with a fractured hip (184, 185).”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [184]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- ENEROTH, M., OLSSON, U., & THORNGREN, K.
- Affiliations
- Skåne University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- ENEROTH, M
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-303
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999143536
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- hip fracture, malnutrition, nutritional status, fluid intake, energy intake, supplementary nutrition, enteral nutrition, hospitalized patients
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Drinking, Female, Hip Fractures, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Nutritional Requirements, Nutritional Status, Prospective Studies, Nutrition Assessment, Nutritional Support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review