Cited by 47Bone health and osteoporosis researchNutrition and Health in AgingHip and Femur Fractures

Effects of protein-rich supplementation and nandrolone on bone tissue after a hip fracture

Tengstrand, Birgitta, Cederholm, Tommy, Söderqvist, Anita, Tidermark, Jan·2007·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Osteoporosis is a major health problem worldwide. Low weight is a major risk factor for low bone mass and fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects on bone tissue of protein-rich supplementation alone or in combination with nandrolone decanoate in lean elderly women after a hip fracture. Methods Sixty elderly women with BMI <24 kg/m(2) admitted to hospital due to a femoral neck fracture were randomised to a control group, to receive a protein-rich formula or to receive the same formula with an addition of nandrolone decanoate for 6 months. All patients received additional calcium and vitamin D. The effects after 6 and 12 months were measured by means of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and with biochemical bone markers. Osteocalcin and C-terminal telopeptide of collagen-1 (CTX) were used to estimate bone formation and bone resorption, respectively. Results The analyses showed an increase in total body BMD at 6 and 12 months in patients who received protein-rich supplementation. Nandrolone decanoate did not appear to have any additional effect on BMD. Osteocalcin increased in all groups while no significant changes were found for CTX. Conclusion The overall results of the study indicated that protein-rich supplementation given to lean elderly female hip fracture patients increased the total body BMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.03.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tengstrand, B., Cederholm, T., Söderqvist, A., & Tidermark, J.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Tidermark, Jan
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
460-465
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058198425
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
Keywords
nandrolone decanoate, hip fracture, femoral neck fracture, osteoporosis, bone mineral density, older women, lean women, bone formation markers, osteocalcin, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, anabolic steroid therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Dietary Proteins, Female, Hip Fractures, Humans, Nandrolone, Biomarkers, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Osteocalcin, Treatment Outcome, Fracture Healing, Dietary Supplements, Anabolic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review