Effects of protein-rich supplementation and nandrolone on bone tissue after a hip fracture
Abstract
Background & aims Osteoporosis is a major health problem worldwide. Low weight is a major risk factor for low bone mass and fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects on bone tissue of protein-rich supplementation alone or in combination with nandrolone decanoate in lean elderly women after a hip fracture. Methods Sixty elderly women with BMI <24 kg/m(2) admitted to hospital due to a femoral neck fracture were randomised to a control group, to receive a protein-rich formula or to receive the same formula with an addition of nandrolone decanoate for 6 months. All patients received additional calcium and vitamin D. The effects after 6 and 12 months were measured by means of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and with biochemical bone markers. Osteocalcin and C-terminal telopeptide of collagen-1 (CTX) were used to estimate bone formation and bone resorption, respectively. Results The analyses showed an increase in total body BMD at 6 and 12 months in patients who received protein-rich supplementation. Nandrolone decanoate did not appear to have any additional effect on BMD. Osteocalcin increased in all groups while no significant changes were found for CTX. Conclusion The overall results of the study indicated that protein-rich supplementation given to lean elderly female hip fracture patients increased the total body BMD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Considerable evidence supports that supplemental protein or higher dietary protein intake by older people hospitalized for hip fracture could reduce risk for complications, improve bone mineral density, and reduce rehabilitation time.
“Considerable evidence supports the concept that supplemental protein or higher dietary protein intake by older people hospitalized for hip fracture could reduce risk for complications, 74,84,85 improve bone mineral density, 86,87 and reduce rehabilitation time (Table 4).86”
From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as [87]
A 6-month RCT in lean women after hip fracture showed improved BMD with 20 g/d protein supplementation.
“Tengstrand 2007 87 20 g extra/d RCT for 6 months in lean women after hip fracture showing improved BMD with protein supplementation”
From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as Tengstrand 2007
Cites
Tidermark, J., Ponzer, S., Carlsson, P., Söderqvist, A., Brismar, K., Tengstrand, B., & Cederholm, T. (2004) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2003.10.006 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Cited by 2,553 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Milne, A. C., Potter, J., Vivanti, A., & Avenell, A. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub3 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Protein Intake and Muscle Health in Old Age: From Biological Plausibility to Clinical Evidence
Landi, F., Calvani, R., Tosato, M., Martone, A., Ortolani, E., Savera, G., D’Angelo, E., Sisto, A., & Marzetti, E. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8050295 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tengstrand, B., Cederholm, T., Söderqvist, A., & Tidermark, J.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Tidermark, Jan
- ORCID
- Cederholm, Tommy
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 460-465
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058198425
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
- Keywords
- nandrolone decanoate, hip fracture, femoral neck fracture, osteoporosis, bone mineral density, older women, lean women, bone formation markers, osteocalcin, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, anabolic steroid therapy
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Dietary Proteins, Female, Hip Fractures, Humans, Nandrolone, Biomarkers, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Osteocalcin, Treatment Outcome, Fracture Healing, Dietary Supplements, Anabolic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review