Protein-enriched ‘regular products’ and their effect on protein intake in acute hospitalized older adults; a randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background & aims Especially in older adults, maintaining muscle mass is essential to perform activities of daily living. This requires a sufficient protein intake. However, protein intake in hospitalized older adults is often insufficient. Thus far different nutrition intervention strategies have failed to show success in reaching sufficient protein intake in hospitalized older adults. The effect of recently developed protein-enriched bread and drinking yoghurt on protein intake is still unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the effect of protein-enriched bread and drinking yoghurt on the protein intake of acute hospitalized older adults (≥55 years). Methods This study was performed as a single blind randomized controlled trial in 47 hospitalized elderly acutely admitted to a university hospital. During three consecutive days participants received either ad libitum protein-enriched bread and drinking yoghurt or normal, non-enriched products as part of their daily meals. The protein-enriched bread contained 6.9 g of protein per serving and the normal bread 3.8 g of protein. For drinking yoghurt this was 20.0 g and 7.5 g of protein per serving respectively. The products were almost isocaloric. Food intake of participants was measured and nutritional values were calculated according to the Dutch Food Composition Table. An independent sample t-test was used to compare protein intake between the intervention and control group. Results Analyses illustrate a protein intake in the intervention group of 75.0 ± 33.2 g per day versus 58.4 ± 14.5 g in the control group (p = 0.039). Intervention patients had a mean protein intake of 1.1 g/kg/day, with 36% of the patients reaching the minimum requirement of 1.2 g/kg/day; in control patients this was 0.9 g/kg/day (p = 0.041) and 8% (p = 0.030). Bread and drinking yoghurt contributed almost equally to the increased intake of protein in the intervention group. Conclusions The use of protein-enriched bread and drinking yoghurt, consumed as part of regular meals, is a promising and feasible solution to increase the protein intake of acutely ill patients. It needs to be confirmed whether the use of these products will also result in a better clinical outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov ID number: NCT01907152.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The recommended level for protein intake varies between studies but most studies referring to a recommendation are in the span between 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg BW/day.
“The recommended level for protein intake varies between 513 studies but most studies referring to a recommendation are in the span between 1.0 – 1.5 g/kg 514 BW/day [28, 29, 32, 36].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The Results passage in our copy (labeled Abstract; no page given) calls 1.2 g/kg/day a minimum requirement, which falls within the claimed range. It does not establish that recommendations vary across studies or that most lie between 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg body weight per day. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn acutely ill patients, increased protein intake could be obtained.
“increased protein intake 442 of acutely ill patients could be obtained.”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Eight studies investigate the effect of dietary enrichment.
“Eight studies investigate the effect of dietary enrichment [25-32].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Cited by 2,553 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Dietary proteins, next to exercise, are thought to play a role in preventing and managing sarcopenia [3].”
BackgroundThe Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass
Roza, A. M., & Shizgal, H. M. (1984) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/40.1.168 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Dietary protein: its role in satiety, energetics, weight loss and health.
Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S., Lemmens, S. G., & Westerterp, K. R. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512002589 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition
Thibault, R., Abbasoglu, O., Ioannou, E., Meija, L., Ottens-Oussoren, K., Pichard, C., Rothenberg, E., Rubin, D., Siljamäki-Ojansuu, U., Vaillant, M.-F., et al. (2021) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.039 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stelten, S., Dekker, I. M., Ronday, E. M., Thijs, A., Boelsma, E., Peppelenbos, H. W., & de van der Schueren, M. A. E.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 409-414
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151965384
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie (TKI-AF-12065)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- protein intake, hospitalized older adults, acute illness, dietary intervention, muscle mass preservation, food fortification
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bread, Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Fortified, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Yogurt, Body Mass Index, Single-Blind Method, Meals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review