CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 401Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcareClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ESPEN guideline on ethical aspects of artificial nutrition and hydration

Druml, Christiane, Ballmer, Peter E., Druml, Wilfred, Oehmichen, Frank, Shenkin, Alan, Singer, Pierre, Soeters, Peter, Weimann, Arved, Bischoff, Stephan C.·2016·Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background The worldwide debate over the use of artificial nutrition and hydration remains controversial although the scientific and medical facts are unequivocal. Artificial nutrition and hydration are a medical intervention, requiring an indication, a therapeutic goal and the will (consent) of the competent patient. Methods The guideline was developed by an international multidisciplinary working group based on the main aspects of the Guideline on "Ethical and Legal Aspects of Artificial Nutrition" published 2013 by the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM) after conducting a review of specific current literature. The text was extended and introduced a broader view in particular on the impact of culture and religion. The results were discussed at the ESPEN Congress in Lisbon 2015 and accepted in an online survey among ESPEN members. Results The ESPEN Guideline on Ethical Aspects of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration is focused on the adult patient and provides a critical summary for physicians and caregivers. Special consideration is given to end of life issues and palliative medicine; to dementia and to specific situations like nursing care or the intensive care unit. The respect for autonomy is an important focus of the guideline as well as the careful wording to be used in the communication with patients and families. The other principles of Bioethics like beneficence, non-maleficence and justice are presented in the context of artificial nutrition and hydration…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.006

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 81 references

2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lemke, 2003, PEG installation in patients unable to give informed consent, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 128, 160
  2. 2006, The World Medical Association Declaration of Tokyo. Guidelines for physicians concerning torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in relation to detention and imprisonment, World Med J, 52, 34

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 398

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Druml, C., Ballmer, P. E., Druml, W., Oehmichen, F., Shenkin, A., Singer, P., Soeters, P., Weimann, A., & Bischoff, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Kantonsspital Winterthur (CH)
  • Klinik Bavaria (DE)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Klinikum St. Georg (DE)
  • University of Hohenheim (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Druml, Christiane
  • Ballmer, Peter E.
  • Druml, Wilfred
  • Oehmichen, Frank
  • Shenkin, Alan
  • Singer, Pierre
  • Soeters, Peter
  • Weimann, Arved
  • Bischoff, Stephan C.
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
545-556
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.clnu.2016.02.006
OpenAlex
W2283015666
Cited by
401
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5
FWCI
28.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
artificial nutrition, artificial hydration, end-of-life care, palliative care, dementia, intensive care, nursing care, patient autonomy, withholding and withdrawing treatment, hunger strikes, force-feeding, cultural and religious beliefs, bioethics, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, patient-family communication
MeSH terms
Adult, Dietetics, Europe, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Legislation, Medical, Palliative Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Professional-Family Relations, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Societies, Scientific, Terminal Care, Nutritional Support, Evidence-Based Medicine, Personal Autonomy, Withholding Treatment, Precision Medicine, Culturally Competent Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review