Cited by 26Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Nutritional intervention in acute heart failure patients with undernutrition and normalbuminemia: A subgroup analysis of PICNIC study

Ramiro-Ortega, Esmeralda, Bonilla-Palomas, Juan L., Gámez-López, Antonio L., Moreno-Conde, Mirian, López-Ibáñez, María C., Alhambra-Expósito, Rosa, Anguita Sánchez, Manuel·2018·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Hypoalbuminemia is common in acute heart failure (HF) patients and has been associated with increased hospital mortality and long-term mortality. Undernutrition is a factor causing hypoalbuminemia. The PICNIC study results show that a nutritional intervention in undernourished acute HF patients reduces the risks of all-cause death and of readmission for HF. We aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of a nutritional intervention is consistent among the subgroups of patients with and without hypoalbuminemia. Methods In PICNIC study, a total of 120 malnourished hospitalized patients due to acute HF were randomized to conventional HF treatment or conventional HF treatment combined with an individualized nutritional intervention. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or readmission for worsening of HF, with a maximum follow-up of 12 months. In this post-hoc sub-analysis we assessed the interaction of the effects of a nutritional intervention among patients with and without hypoalbuminemia. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results 59 (49,2%) patients demonstrated hypoalbuminemia and 61 (50,8%) had normalbuminemia. At 12 months, the number of events for the primary endpoint in the intervention group compared with the control group was consistent among patients with hypoalbuminemia (28.6% intervention vs 61.3% control, HR 0,35, 95% CI 0,15-0,81) and those without (25.8% intervention vs 60% control, HR 0,35, 95% CI 0,15-0,79; interaction p = 0…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.07.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of nutritional intervention did not differ comparing patients with hypoalbuminemia and with normalbuminemia.

    “These effects did not differ comparing patients with hypoalbuminemia and with normalbuminemia”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramiro-Ortega, E., Bonilla-Palomas, J. L., Gámez-López, A. L., Moreno-Conde, M., López-Ibáñez, M. C., Alhambra-Expósito, R., & Anguita Sánchez, M.
Affiliations
  • Hospital San Juan de la Cruz (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1762-1764
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2735428440
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Spanish Society of Cardiology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
acute heart failure, dietary intervention, malnutrition, hypoalbuminemia, subgroup analysis, all-cause mortality, heart failure readmission, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Readmission, Serum Albumin, Hypoalbuminemia, Malnutrition, Nutrition Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review