Nutritional intervention in acute heart failure patients with undernutrition and normalbuminemia: A subgroup analysis of PICNIC study
Abstract
Background & aims Hypoalbuminemia is common in acute heart failure (HF) patients and has been associated with increased hospital mortality and long-term mortality. Undernutrition is a factor causing hypoalbuminemia. The PICNIC study results show that a nutritional intervention in undernourished acute HF patients reduces the risks of all-cause death and of readmission for HF. We aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of a nutritional intervention is consistent among the subgroups of patients with and without hypoalbuminemia. Methods In PICNIC study, a total of 120 malnourished hospitalized patients due to acute HF were randomized to conventional HF treatment or conventional HF treatment combined with an individualized nutritional intervention. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or readmission for worsening of HF, with a maximum follow-up of 12 months. In this post-hoc sub-analysis we assessed the interaction of the effects of a nutritional intervention among patients with and without hypoalbuminemia. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results 59 (49,2%) patients demonstrated hypoalbuminemia and 61 (50,8%) had normalbuminemia. At 12 months, the number of events for the primary endpoint in the intervention group compared with the control group was consistent among patients with hypoalbuminemia (28.6% intervention vs 61.3% control, HR 0,35, 95% CI 0,15-0,81) and those without (25.8% intervention vs 60% control, HR 0,35, 95% CI 0,15-0,79; interaction p = 0…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of nutritional intervention did not differ comparing patients with hypoalbuminemia and with normalbuminemia.
“These effects did not differ comparing patients with hypoalbuminemia and with normalbuminemia”
From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [128]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients
Wunderle, C., Gomes, F., Schuetz, P., Stumpf, F., Austin, P., Ballesteros-Pomar, M. D., Cederholm, T., Fletcher, J., Laviano, A., Norman, K., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.023 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“These effects did not differ comparing patients with hypoalbuminemia andwith normalbuminemia [128] (Level of Evidence 1þ).”
Background
- Authors
- Ramiro-Ortega, E., Bonilla-Palomas, J. L., Gámez-López, A. L., Moreno-Conde, M., López-Ibáñez, M. C., Alhambra-Expósito, R., & Anguita Sánchez, M.
- Affiliations
- Hospital San Juan de la Cruz (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES)
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1762-1764
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735428440
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Spanish Society of Cardiology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Keywords
- acute heart failure, dietary intervention, malnutrition, hypoalbuminemia, subgroup analysis, all-cause mortality, heart failure readmission, hospitalized patients
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Patient Readmission, Serum Albumin, Hypoalbuminemia, Malnutrition, Nutrition Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review