Cited by 188Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNosocomial Infections in ICUIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

Timing of PROTein INtake and clinical outcomes of adult critically ill patients on prolonged mechanical VENTilation: The PROTINVENT retrospective study

Open access
Koekkoek, W.A.C. (Kristine), van Setten, C.H. (Coralien), Olthof, Laura E., Kars, J.C.N. (Hans), van Zanten, Arthur R.H.·2019·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Optimal protein intake during critical illness is unknown. Conflicting results on nutritional support during the first week of ICU stay have been published. We addressed timing of protein intake and outcomes in ICU patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We retrospectively collected nutritional and clinical data on the first 7 days of ICU admission of adult critically ill patients, who were mechanically ventilated in our ICU for at least 7 days and admitted between January 1st 2011 and December 31st 2015. Based on recent literature, patients were divided into 3 protein intake categories, <0.8 g/kg/day, 0.8-1.2 g/kg/day and >1.2 g/kg/day. Our primary aim was to identify the optimum protein dose and timing related to the lowest 6 month mortality. Secondary endpoints were ventilation duration, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), ICU length of stay (LOS) and mortality and hospital LOS and mortality. RESULTS: In total 455 patients met the inclusion criteria. We found a time-dependent association of protein intake and mortality; low protein intake (<0.8 g/kg/day) before day 3 and high protein intake (>0.8 g/kg/day) after day 3 was associated with lower 6-month mortality, adjusted HR 0.609; 95% CI 0.480-0.772, p < 0.001) compared to patients with overall high protein intake. Lowest 6-month mortality was found when increasing protein intake from <0.8 g/kg/day on day 1-2 to 0.8-1.2 g/kg/day on day 3-5 and >1.2 g/kg/day after day 5. Moreover, overall low protein intake was associated with the highest ICU, in-hospital and 6-month mortality. No differences in ICU LOS, need for RRT or ventilation duration were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that although overall low protein intake is associated with the highest mortality risk, high protein intake during the first 3-5 days of ICU stay is also associated with increased long-term mortality. Therefore, timing of high protein intake may be relevant for optimizing ICU, in-hospital and long-term mortality outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.02.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High protein intake during the first 3 to 5 days increased long-term mortality.

    “High protein intake during the first 3 to 5 days also increased long-term mortality.”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Koekkoek et al. found that the low protein group had the highest ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality.

    “Overall, the low protein group had the highest ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality.”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Lowest 6-month mortality was observed when protein input gradually increased from low values during the first days of ICU stay to high levels from day 5.

    “Lowest 6-month mortality was observed when protein input gradually increased from low values during the first days of ICU stay to high levels from day 5 [27].”

    From Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review. (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

  • The timing of administration has been mainly studied retrospectively or in post hoc analysis.

    “The timing of administration has been mainly studied retrospectively or in post hoc analysis [62].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 188

Authors
Koekkoek, W. A. C. (., van Setten, C. H. (., Olthof, L. E., Kars, J. C. N. (., & van Zanten, A. R. H.
Affiliations
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Koekkoek, W.A.C. (Kristine)
  • Olthof, Laura E.
  • Kars, J.C.N. (Hans)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
883-890
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791854234
Cited by
188
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
protein dose, critical illness, prolonged mechanical ventilation, intensive care nutrition, nutritional support, mortality, renal replacement therapy, ICU length of stay, long-term mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Critical Illness, Nutritional Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review