Differences in effect of early enteral nutrition on mortality among ventilated adults with shock requiring low-, medium-, and high-dose noradrenaline: a propensity-matched analysis
Abstract
Background & aims Despite extensive research on early enteral nutrition (EEN), it remains unclear whether EEN is effective for patients with shock requiring vasopressors. This study aimed to compare outcomes between EEN and late enteral nutrition (LEN) in ventilated patients with shock requiring low-, medium-, or high-dose noradrenaline. Methods Using a national inpatient database in Japan, we identified ventilated patients admitted to intensive care units who had shock requiring catecholamines (noradrenaline or dobutamine) from July 2010 to March 2016. We defined patients who started enteral nutrition within 2 days after starting mechanical ventilation as EEN group and the others as LEN group. Propensity score matching was performed between patients undergoing EEN and LEN in each of the low- (<0.1 μg/kg/min), medium- (0.1-0.3 μg/kg/min), and high-dose (≥0.3 μg/kg/min) noradrenaline groups. Results We identified 52,563 eligible patients during the 69-month study period, including 38,488, 11,042, and 3033 patients in the low-, medium-, and high-dose noradrenaline groups, respectively. One-to-two propensity score matching created 5,969, 2,162, and 477 one-to-two matched pairs in the low-, medium-, and high-dose noradrenaline groups, respectively. The 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the EEN than LEN group in the low-dose noradrenaline group (risk difference, -2.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.5% to -1.3%) and in the medium-dose noradrenaline group (risk difference, -6.8%; 95% CI, -9.6% to -4.0%). In the high-dose noradrenaline group, 28-day mortality did not differ significantly between the EEN and LEN groups (absolute risk difference, -1.4%; 95% CI, -7.4%-4.7%). Conclusions Although the size of the subgroup requiring high-dose noradrenaline may have been too small to demonstrate a significant difference, the results suggest that EEN was associated with a reduction in mortality in ventilated adults treated with low- or medium-dose noradrenaline but not in those requiring high-dose noradrenaline.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enteral nutrition is not contraindicated during low-dose vasopressor administration.
“EN is not contraindicated during low-dose vasopressor administration, and the benefits of early versus late EN have been seen in patients receiving low to moderate vasopressor dosing.157”
From Malnutrition and Cachexia in Inpatients With Acute Cardiac Conditions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2026) · cites this paper as [157]
The benefits of early versus late enteral nutrition have been seen in patients receiving low to moderate vasopressor dosing.
“EN is not contraindicated during low-dose vasopressor administration, and the benefits of early versus late EN have been seen in patients receiving low to moderate vasopressor dosing.157”
From Malnutrition and Cachexia in Inpatients With Acute Cardiac Conditions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2026) · cites this paper as [157]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Ohbe, H., Jo, T., Matsui, H., Fushimi, K., & Yasunaga, H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ohbe, Hiroyuki
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 460-467
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914553609
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (H29-ICT-Genral-004, H29-Policy-Designated-009)
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (17H04141)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Keywords
- early enteral nutrition, shock, norepinephrine, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, intensive care, 28-day mortality, dobutamine, catecholamines, timing of enteral feeding, critically ill adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Norepinephrine, Respiration, Artificial, Shock, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Databases, Factual, Propensity Score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review