Cited by 81Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDialysis and Renal Disease Management

The GLIM criteria for defining malnutrition can predict physical function and prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease

Kootaka, Yoshifumi, Kamiya, Kentaro, Hamazaki, Nobuaki, Nozaki, Kohei, Ichikawa, Takafumi, Nakamura, Takeshi, Yamashita, Masashi, Maekawa, Emi +4 more·2021·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) published a new international standard for defining malnutrition in 2018. The GLIM criteria were compared with the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria in relation to physical function and mortality risk in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods A total of 921 CVD patients ≥ 20 years old (67.8 ± 13.4 years, 631 men) hospitalised for heart failure, acute coronary syndrome and other conditions were stratified according to the presence or absence of malnutrition according to the GLIM and ESPEN criteria. Physical function was assessed by measuring grip strength, 6-minute walking distance and quadriceps isometric strength before hospital discharge, and the endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results During the median follow-up period of 2.3 years (interquartile range, 0.9-3.5 years), 194 deaths occurred in the study population. Malnutrition defined by the GLIM criteria was significantly associated with low physical function. Malnutrition defined by both the GLIM and ESPEN criteria was significantly related to all-cause mortality (P < 0.05). Conclusions Malnutrition defined according to the GLIM criteria was a predictor of both low physical function and mortality in patients with CVD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.04.038

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kootaka, Y., Kamiya, K., Hamazaki, N., Nozaki, K., Ichikawa, T., Nakamura, T., Yamashita, M., Maekawa, E., Reed, J. L., Yamaoka-Tojo, M., Matsunaga, A., & Ako, J.
Affiliations
  • Kitasato University (JP)
  • Kitasato University Hospital (JP)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Kamiya, Kentaro
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
146-152
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023019899
Cited by
81
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K11371, 19K19884, 18K10757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
malnutrition, GLIM criteria, ESPEN criteria, cardiovascular disease, physical function, all-cause mortality, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, grip strength, 6-minute walk distance, nutritional assessment
MeSH terms
Walk Test, Functional Status, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Nutrition Assessment, Risk Assessment, Hand Strength, Malnutrition, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review