Cited by 55Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Malnutrition risk screening: New insights in a new era

Open access
de van der Schueren, Marian A.E., Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët·2022·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Twenty years ago, ESPEN published its "Guidelines for nutritional screening 2002", with the note that these guidelines were based on the evidence available until 2002, and that they needed to be updated and adapted to current state of knowledge in the future. Twenty years have passed, and tremendous progress has been made in the field of malnutrition risk screening. Many screening tools have been developed and validated for different patient groups and different health care settings. Some countries even have introduced mandatory screening for malnutrition at admission to hospital. Yet, changes in society and healthcare require a reflection on current practice and policies regarding malnutrition risk screening. In this opinion paper, we share our perspectives on malnutrition risk screening in the twenty-twenties, addressing the changing and varying profile of the malnourished individual, the goals of screening and screening tools (i.e., preventive or reactive), the construct of malnutrition risk (i.e., screening for risk factors or screening for existing malnutrition), and screening alongside a patient's journey.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.08.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many validated screening tools are now available, with most focusing on identification of individuals who already have signs of malnutrition, whereas others identify risk factors for developing malnutrition.

    “Many validated screening tools are now available, 31 , 32 with most focusing on the identification of individuals who already have signs of malnutrition, whereas others identify risk factors for developing malnutrition. 33 , 34 , 35 , 36”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Vellas B, Plauth M. ESPEN Guidelines for nutritional screening. Clin Nutr 2003;22(4):415e21.
  2. van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Guaitoli PR, Jansma EP, de Vet HC. Nutrition screening tools: does one size fit all? A systematic review of screening tools for the hospital setting. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2014;33(1):39e58.
  3. van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MAE, Guaitoli PR, Jansma EP, de Vet HCW. A systematic review of malnutrition screening tools for the nursing home setting. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15(3):171e84.
  4. Leij-Halfwerk S, Verwijs MH, van Houdt S, Borkent JW, Guaitoli PR, Pelgrim T, et al. Prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition risk in European older adults in community, residential and hospital settings, according to 22 malnutrition screening tools validated for use in adults 65 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 2019;126:80e9.
  5. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia M, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition -A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2019;38(1):1e9.
  6. Sobotka L, Allison S, Forbes A, Meier RF, Soeters PB, Stanga Z, et al. Basics in clinical nutrition, fifth edition. ESPEN, and Publishing House Gal en; 2019.
  7. Inciong JFB, Chaudhary A, Hsu HS, Joshi R, Seo JM, Trung LV, et al. Economic burden of hospital malnutrition: a cost-of-illness model. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2022;48:342e50.
  8. Guenter P, Abdelhadi R, Anthony P, Blackmer A, Malone A, Mirtallo JM, et al. Malnutrition diagnoses and associated outcomes in hospitalized patients: United States, 2018. Nutr Clin Pract 2021;36(5):957e69.
  9. Goates S, Du K, Braunschweig CA, Arensberg MB. Economic burden of disease- associated malnutrition at the state level. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0161833.
  10. Freijer K, Tan SS, Koopmanschap MA, Meijers JM, Halfens RJ, Nuijten MJ. The economic costs of disease related malnutrition. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scot- land) 2013;32(1):136e41.
  11. Botero L, Young AM, Banks MD, Bauer J. Incidence and criteria used in the diagnosis of hospital-acquired malnutrition in adults: a systematic review and pooled incidence analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41430-022-01141-2. ahead of print. · DOI
  12. van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Lonterman-Monasch S, de Vries OJ, Danner SA, Kramer MH, Muller M. Prevalence and determinants for malnu- trition in geriatric outpatients. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2013;32: 1007e11.
  13. Ter Beek L, Vanhauwaert E, Slinde F, Orrevall Y, Henriksen C, Johansson M, et al. Unsatisfactory knowledge and use of terminology regarding malnutri- tion, starvation, cachexia and sarcopenia among dietitians. Clin Nutr (Edin- burgh, Scotland) 2016;35(6):1450e6.
  14. Kiss N, Bauer J, Boltong A, Brown T, Isenring L, Loeliger J, et al. Awareness, perceptions and practices regarding cancer-related malnutrition and sarco- penia: a survey of cancer clinicians. Support Care Cancer 2020;28(11): 5263e70.
  15. Cuerda C, Schneider SM, Van Gossum A. Clinical nutrition education in medical schools: results of an ESPEN survey. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2017;36(4):915e6.
  16. Bavelaar JW, Otter CD, van Bodegraven AA, Thijs A, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA. Diagnosis and treatment of (disease-related) in-hospital malnutrition: the performance of medical and nursing staff. Clin Nutr (Edin- burgh, Scotland) 2008;27(3):431e8.
  17. Dominguez Castro P, Reynolds CM, Kennelly S, Clyne B, Bury G, Hanlon D, et al. General practitioners' views on malnutrition management and oral nutritional supplementation prescription in the community: a qualitative study. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2020;36:116e27.
  18. Verwijs MH, Puijk-Hekman S, van der Heijden E, Vasse E, de Groot L, de van der Schueren MAE. Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration as key to improved nutritional care of malnourished older adults across health-care settings -a qualitative study. Health Expect 2020;23(5):1096e107.
  19. Reinders JJ, Hobbelen SJM, Tieland M, Weijs PJM, Jager-Wittenaar H. Inter- professional treatment of malnutrition and sarcopenia by dietitians and physiotherapists: exploring attitudes, interprofessional identity, facilitators, barriers, and occurrence. J Multidiscip Healthc 2022;15:1247e60. https:// doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S358237. · DOI
  20. Sulo S, Feldstein J, Partridge J, Schwander B, Sriram K, Summerfelt WT. Budget impact of a comprehensive nutrition-focused quality improvement program for malnourished hospitalized patients. Am Health Drug Benefits 2017;10(5): 262e70.
  21. Kruizenga HM, Van Tulder MW, Seidell JC, Thijs A, Ader HJ, Van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early screening and treatment of malnourished patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82(5):1082e9.
  22. Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, Ballmer P, Biolo G, Bischoff SC, et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr 2017;36(1):49e64.
  23. van Vliet IMY, Gomes-Neto AW, de Jong MFC, Bakker SJL, Jager-Wittenaar H, Navis GJ. Malnutrition screening on hospital admission: impact of overweight and obesity on comparative performance of MUST and PG-SGA SF. Eur J Clin Nutr 2021;75(9):1398e406.
  24. De van der Schueren MAE, Keller H, Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Compher C, Correia M, et al. Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM): guidance on validation of the operational criteria for the diagnosis of protein-energy malnutrition in adults. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2020;39(9):2872e80.
  25. Keller HH, Goy R, Kane SL. Validity and reliability of SCREEN II (Seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition, Version II). Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59(10):1149e57.
  26. Kruizenga HM, Seidell JC, de Vet HCW, Wierdsma NJ, Van Bokhorst-de Van der S. Development and validation of a hospital screening tool for malnutri- tion: the short nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ). Clin Nutr 2005;24(1):75e82.
  27. Borkent JW, Schuurman LT, Beelen J, Linschooten JO, Keller HH, Roodenburg AJC, et al. What do screening tools measure? Lessons learned from SCREEN II and SNAQ(65). Clin Nutr ESPEN 2020;38:172e7.
  28. Sealy MJ, Haß U, Ottery FD, van der Schans CP, Roodenburg JLN, Jager- Wittenaar H. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Scored Patient- Generated Subjective Global Assessment: an interdisciplinary nutritional in- strument appropriate for Dutch cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 2018;41(6): 450e62.
  29. Jager-Wittenaar H, Ottery FD. Assessing nutritional status in cancer: role of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2017;20(5):322e9.
  30. Gomes-Neto AW, van Vliet IMY, Ost e MCJ, de Jong MFC, Bakker SJL, Jager- Wittenaar H, et al. Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool and Patient- Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form and their predictive validity in hospitalized patients. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2021;45:252e61.
  31. Sahyoun NR, Jacques PF, Dallal GE, Russell RM. Nutrition Screening Initiative Checklist may be a better awareness/educational tool than a screening one. J Am Diet Assoc 1997;97(7):760e4.
  32. van der Zee CH, Kap A, Rambaran Mishre R, Schouten EJ, Post MW. Respon- siveness of four participation measures to changes during and after outpatient rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2011;43(11):1003e9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de van der Schueren, M. A. E., & Jager-Wittenaar, H.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
2163-2168
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292136512
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
malnutrition screening, nutritional screening, screening tool, ESPEN guidelines, hospital admission screening, risk factors for malnutrition, patient journey, malnutrition prevalence
MeSH terms
Hospitalization, Humans, Mass Screening, Nutritional Status, Nutrition Assessment, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review