Cited by 344Advances in Oncology and RadiotherapyGlobal Health and SurgeryAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Need for Radiotherapy in Low and Middle Income Countries – The Silent Crisis Continues

Open access
Zubizarreta, E.H., Fidarova, E., Healy, B., Rosenblatt, E.·2015·Clinical Oncology

Abstract

About 57% of the total number of cancer cases occur in low and middle income countries. Radiotherapy is one of the main components of cancer treatment and requires substantial initial investment in infrastructure and training. Many departments continue to have basic facilities and to use simple techniques, while modern technologies have only been installed in big cities in upper-middle income countries. More than 50% of cancer patients requiring radiotherapy in low and middle income countries lack access to treatment. The situation is dramatic in low income countries, where the proportion is higher than 90%. The overall number of additional teletherapy units needed corresponds to about twice the installed capacity in Europe. The figures for different income level groups clearly show the correlation between gross national income per capita and the availability of services. The range of radiotherapy needs currently covered varies from 0% and 3-4% in low income countries in Latin America and Africa up to 59-79% in upper-middle income countries in Europe and Central Asia. The number of additional radiation oncologists, medical physicist, dosimetrists and radiation therapists (RTTs) required to operate additional radiotherapy departments needed is 43 200 professionals. Training and education programmes are not available in every developing country and in many cases the only option is sending trainees abroad, which is not a cost-effective solution. The implementation of adequate local training should be the following step after establishing the first radiotherapy facility in any country. Joint efforts should be made to establish at least one radiotherapy facility in countries where they do not exist, in order to create radiotherapy communities that could be the base for future expansion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clon.2014.10.006

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among cancer patients in LMICs who need radiotherapy, 50 to 90% cannot access it.

    “Consequently, 50 to 90% of cancer patients requiring radiotherapy in LMICs lack access to this relatively affordable and effective treatment modality (5).”

    From Artificial intelligence for global health (2019) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Radiotherapy in Africa: current needs and prospects. IAEA Bulletin; 1991.
  2. Review of optimal radiotherapy utilisation rates. Australia: Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (IIAMR) - Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CCORE) 2013.
  3. Wong K. Estimation of the optimal number of radiotherapy fractions for cancer patients: a review of the evidence. South Western Sydney: University of New South Wales Clinical School; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zubizarreta, E. H., Fidarova, E., Healy, B., & Rosenblatt, E.
Affiliations
International Atomic Energy Agency (AT)
Corresponding author
Zubizarreta, E.H.
Venue
Clinical Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
107-114
ISSN
0936-6555 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069452545
Cited by
344
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Keywords
radiotherapy access, low- and middle-income countries, access to cancer care, radiation oncology workforce, radiation therapy training, gross national income, radiotherapy infrastructure, global cancer burden
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review