Sources of uncertainty in the closed-loop supply chain of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles
Open accessAbstract
Due to increasing demand for electric vehicles and short innovation circles of battery, production, and recycling technology, different uncertainties need to be faced at different stages of the supply chain. However, a qualitative analysis of the uncertainties and their sources is missing. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose an empirical approach to the identification of uncertainty occurring in the closed-loop supply chain of lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles (uncertainty in supply, process, demand, control, and environmental uncertainty). The investigation methodology consists of a content analysis of press media documents related to electric vehicles and the automotive industry. The final content analysis comprises 102 evidences of uncertainty. Consequently, the evidences of uncertainty found are classified in a spectrum between statistical uncertainty and total ignorance (levels of uncertainty). Graphs and data are described to provide detailed information. The results signal predominant environmental uncertainty besides the uncertainty within control and supply of the closed-loop. A conclusion on the investigation shows cobalt as a raw material responsible for increasing uncertainty (boomerang effect). Additionally, the content analysis evidences uncertainty with the availability, quantity, stock control policies, government regulations, and political instability with cobalt, lithium, and nickel.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have investigated the 'closed loop' supply chain.
“Since one of the advantages of mineral supply chains is their ability to be reused in the supply chain, many studies have investigated the 'closed loop' supply chain [84-90].”
From Lithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries (2024) · cites this paper as [90]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Marcos, J. T., Scheller, C., Godina, R., Spengler, T. S., & Carvalho, H.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
- Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Godina, R.
- Venue
- Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 100006
- ISSN
- 2772-3909 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3199595281
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2022-07-01)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Keywords
- lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, closed-loop supply chain, uncertainty sources, environmental uncertainty, supply uncertainty, cobalt, raw material availability, battery recycling, government regulation, lithium, nickel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review