Cited by 70Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementExtraction and Separation ProcessesSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Sources of uncertainty in the closed-loop supply chain of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles

Open access
Marcos, J.T., Scheller, C., Godina, R., Spengler, T.S., Carvalho, H.·2021·Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain

Abstract

Due to increasing demand for electric vehicles and short innovation circles of battery, production, and recycling technology, different uncertainties need to be faced at different stages of the supply chain. However, a qualitative analysis of the uncertainties and their sources is missing. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose an empirical approach to the identification of uncertainty occurring in the closed-loop supply chain of lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles (uncertainty in supply, process, demand, control, and environmental uncertainty). The investigation methodology consists of a content analysis of press media documents related to electric vehicles and the automotive industry. The final content analysis comprises 102 evidences of uncertainty. Consequently, the evidences of uncertainty found are classified in a spectrum between statistical uncertainty and total ignorance (levels of uncertainty). Graphs and data are described to provide detailed information. The results signal predominant environmental uncertainty besides the uncertainty within control and supply of the closed-loop. A conclusion on the investigation shows cobalt as a raw material responsible for increasing uncertainty (boomerang effect). Additionally, the content analysis evidences uncertainty with the availability, quantity, stock control policies, government regulations, and political instability with cobalt, lithium, and nickel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 88 · Cited by 70

Authors
Marcos, J. T., Scheller, C., Godina, R., Spengler, T. S., & Carvalho, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Corresponding author
Godina, R.
Venue
Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
1
Pages
100006
ISSN
2772-3909 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199595281
Cited by
70
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, closed-loop supply chain, uncertainty sources, environmental uncertainty, supply uncertainty, cobalt, raw material availability, battery recycling, government regulation, lithium, nickel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review