The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EU General Data Protection Regulation: Changes and implications for personal data collecting companies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Vulnerabilities also increase because of the fact that during cloud services, a large amount of EHR data runs on a wide network of integrated remote servers and is accessed by multiple authorized users as a single echo system from different distributed locations [113].”
From Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record: Opportunities and Challenges (2020) · cites this paper as [113]
Citations
Cites
Westin, A. F. (1967) · Cited by 1,908
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Kurian, G. T. (2011) · The Encyclopedia of Political Science · doi:10.4135/9781608712434.n1602 · Cited by 1,270
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(2007) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n199 · Cited by 971
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(1949) · American Journal of International Law · doi:10.2307/2213979 · Cited by 674
ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party
Sotiropoulos, D. M. (2013) · Cited by 434
(2023) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781509967339.v2_0037 · Cited by 378
Mantelero, A. (2013) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2013.03.010 · Cited by 264
The new General Data Protection Regulation: still a sound system for the protection of individuals?
de Hert, P., & Papakonstantinou, V. (2016) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2016.02.006 · Cited by 211
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Coblentz, W. K. (1956) · bepress Legal Repository · doi:10.15779/z38zz1q · Cited by 196
European Data Protection Supervisor
(2020) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781526514240.chapter-007 · Cited by 190
The challenges of privacy by design
Spiekermann, S. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2209249.2209263 · Cited by 178
A systematic methodology for privacy impact assessments: a design science approach
Oetzel, M. C., & Spiekermann, S. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.18 · Cited by 175
Records computers and the rights of citizens
Systems, A. P. D. (1974) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0020-0271(74)90025-4 · Cited by 126
Fair Information Practices: A Basic HistoryPreprint
Gellman, R. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2415020 · Cited by 101
Handbook on European data protection law
European Union Agency For Fundamental Rights - FRA (2019) · Human Rights Documents online · doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9992-20180046 · Cited by 101
The EU-U.S. Privacy Collision: A Turn to Institutions and Procedures
Schwartz, P. M. (2013) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 87
The upcoming data protection reform for the European Union
Reding, V. (2010) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipq007 · Cited by 40
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
(2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316577226.018 · Cited by 37
Perceptions of controllers on EU data protection reform: A Finnish perspective
Mikkonen, T. (2014) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2014.01.011 · Cited by 18
EU data protection reform: Opportunities and concerns
Dix, A., Thüsing, G., Traut, J., Christensen, L. R., Etro, F., Aaronson, S. A., & Maxim, R. (2013) · Intereconomics · doi:10.1007/s10272-013-0470-y · Cited by 10
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield: The saga continues
Tracol, X. (2016) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2016.07.013 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Thüsing, 2013, The reform of European data protection law: harmonisation at last?, Intereconomics, 48, 271
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3387166 · Cited by 785
How to address data privacy concerns when using social media data in conservation science
Minin, E. D., Fink, C., Hausmann, A., Kremer, J., & Kulkarni, R. (2021) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13708 · Cited by 200
Digital deception: generative artificial intelligence in social engineering and phishing
Schmitt, M., & Flechais, I. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10973-2 · Cited by 198
Oswald, F. L., Behrend, T. S., Putka, D. J., & Sinar, E. F. (2019) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104553 · Cited by 193
Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record: Opportunities and Challenges
Shah, S. M., & Khan, R. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3011099 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Tikkinen-Piri, C., Rohunen, A., & Markkula, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Rohunen, Anna
- ORCID
- Markkula, Jouni
- Venue
- Computer Law & Security Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134-153
- ISSN
- 2212-473X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2621635773
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 22
- FWCI
- 280.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer law & security review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Tauno Tönning Foundation
- Finnish Foundation for Technology Promotion
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Law › Government, Law, and Information Management
- Keywords
- General Data Protection Regulation, personal data protection, Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC, GDPR implementation, GDPR compliance, data management practices, technical measures, business strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
