Cited by 264Digitalization, Law, and RegulationFreedom of Expression and DefamationGovernment, Law, and Information Management

The EU proposal for a general data protection regulation and the roots of the “right to be forgotten”

Open access
Mantelero, Alessandro·2013·Computer Law & Security Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clsr.2013.03.010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The condition of withdrawing consent in order for the RtbF to be triggered has not been encompassed in any national or European data protection law so far.

    “For instance, the condition of withdrawing consent in order the RtbF to be triggered has not been encompassed in any national or European data protection law so far [137].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mantelero, A.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Corresponding author
Mantelero, Alessandro
Venue
Computer Law & Security Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
229-235
ISSN
2212-473X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004302204
Cited by
264
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3
FWCI
126.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-10-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Computer law & security review (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Government, Law, and Information Management
Keywords
right to be forgotten, General Data Protection Regulation, Article 17 GDPR, data protection law, online information dissemination, judicial decisions, European Union law, United States law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review