Cited by 100Digitalization, Law, and RegulationIntellectual Property Rights and MediaDiverse Legal and Medical Studies

Ownership of personal data in the Internet of Things

Janeček, Václav·2018·Computer Law & Security Review

Published version of a preprint

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potential users make their interpretations based on their technological frames and on comparisons with interpretations made by other users.

    “Potential users, as argued in [139], make their interpretations based on their technological frames and on comparisons with interpretations made by other users.”
  • The technological, economic, and organizational perspectives are covered within the CE cycle principles of conservation of natural capital, increasing lifespan of resources through technical and biological cycles, and reduction of negative effects of production systems.

    “The technological perspective, economic perspective , and organizational perspective are covered within the CE cycle principles of (1) conservation of natural capital, (2) increasing the lifespan of resources through technical and biological cycles, and (3) reduction of the negative effects of production systems [139].”
  • Data and data ownership will influence the transition to a CE.

    “With the amount of data produced by personal, home, and industrial devices, data and data ownership will influence the transition to a CE [139].”
  • Within I4.0, especially in the Internet of Things, data production is essential.

    “Within I4.0, especially in the domain of the Internet of Things, data production is essential [139].”
  • Lead users (users with experience) will have to be created for high technology products as potential users may not have the experience needed to evaluate or understand the attribute of a new product.

    “According to [139], 'lead users' (users with experience) will have to be created for high technology products as potential users may not have the experience needed to evaluate or understand the attribute of a new product.”

Authors
Janeček, V.
Affiliations
Charles University (CZ)
Corresponding author
Janeček, Václav
Venue
Computer Law & Security Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
1039-1052
ISSN
2212-473X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124935112
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
83.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer law & security review (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • LawArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N023013/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Keywords
personal data ownership, Internet of Things, personal data, EU data protection law, ownership theory, top-down and bottom-up approaches, data protection regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review