The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Advances in computational science offer a principled pipeline for predictive modeling of cardiovascular flows and aspire to provide a valuable tool for monitoring, diagnostics and surgical planning. Such models can be nowadays deployed on large patient-specific topologies of systemic arterial networks and return detailed predictions on flow patterns, wall shear stresses, and pulse wave propagation. However, their success heavily relies on tedious pre-processing and calibration procedures that typically induce a significant computational cost, thus hampering their clinical applicability. In this work we put forth a machine learning framework that enables the seamless synthesis of non-invasive in-vivo measurement techniques and computational flow dynamics models derived from first physical principles. We illustrate this new paradigm by showing how one-dimensional models of pulsatile flow can be used to constrain the output of deep neural networks such that their predictions satisfy the conservation of mass and momentum principles. Once trained on noisy and scattered clinical data of flow and wall displacement, these networks can return physically consistent predictions for velocity, pressure and wall displacement pulse wave propagation, all without the need to employ conventional simulators. A simple post-processing of these outputs can also provide a cheap and effective way for estimating Windkessel model parameters that are required for the calibration of traditional computational models. The effectiveness of the proposed techniques is demonstrated through a series of prototype benchmarks, as well as a realistic clinical case involving in-vivo measurements near the aorta/carotid bifurcation of a healthy human subject.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
Self-citationYushkevich, P. A., Piven, J., Hazlett, H. C., Smith, R. G., Ho, S., Gee, J. C., & Gerig, G. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 · Cited by 8,868 · cited 2×
“The vessel area at each location was quantified by segmenting the 2D Cine images [58].”
MethodPrinciples of Computerized Tomographic Imaging
Kak, A. C., & Slaney, M. (2001) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719277 · Cited by 5,809
Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition
(2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8 · Cited by 2,116
Zhu, Y., & Zabaras, N. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.018 · Cited by 704
Relation between blood pressure and pulse wave velocity for human arteries
Ma, Y., Choi, J., Hourlier-Fargette, A., Xue, Y., Chung, H. U., Lee, J. Y., Wang, X., Xie, Z., Kang, D., Wang, H., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1814392115 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Physics-informed machine learning
Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · Cited by 8,718
Self-citationJagtap, A. D., Kharazmi, E., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113028 · Cited by 1,208
Perspectives on the integration between first-principles and data-driven modeling
Bradley, W., Kim, J., Kilwein, Z., Blakely, L., Eydenberg, M., Jalvin, J., Laird, C., & Boukouvala, F. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107898 · Cited by 231
Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01719 · Cited by 81
Machine Learning for Smart and Energy-Efficient Buildings
Das, H. P., Lin, Y.-W., Agwan, U., Spangher, L., Devonport, A., Yang, Y., Drgoňa, J., Chong, A., Schiavon, S., & Spanos, C. J. (2024) · Environmental Data Science · doi:10.1017/eds.2023.43 · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kissas, G., Yang, Y., Hwuang, E., Witschey, W. R., Detre, J. A., & Perdikaris, P.
- Venue
- Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 358
- Pages
- 112623
- ISSN
- 0045-7825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2973886134
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 22.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112623
- The paper
- Kissas, G., Yang, Y., Hwuang, E., Witschey, W. R., Detre, J. A., & Perdikaris, P. (2020). Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.