The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization
Abstract
Abstract In the present study, an effective optimization framework of aerodynamic shape design is established based on the multi-fidelity deep neural network (MFDNN) model. The objective of the current work is to construct a high-accuracy multi-fidelity surrogate model correlating the configuration parameters of an aircraft and its aerodynamic performance by blending different fidelity information and adaptively learning their linear or nonlinear correlation without any prior assumption. In the optimization framework, the high-fidelity model using a CFD evaluation with fine grid and the low-fidelity model using the same CFD model with coarse grid are applied. Moreover, in each optimization iteration, the high-fidelity infilling strategy by adding the current optimal solution of surrogate model into the high-fidelity database is applied to improve the surrogate accuracy. The low-fidelity infilling strategy which can generate the solutions distributed uniformly in the whole design space is used to update the low-fidelity database for avoiding local optimum. Then, the proposed multi-fidelity optimization framework is validated by two standard synthetic benchmarks. Finally, it is applied to the high-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization of a RAE2822 airfoil parameterized by 10 design variables and a DLR-F4 wing-body configuration parameterized by 30 design variables. The optimization results demonstrate that the proposed multi-fidelity optimization framework can remarkably improve optimization efficiency and outperform the single-fidelity method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
Particle swarm optimization: An overview
Poli, R., Kennedy, J., & Blackwell, T. (2007) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0 · Cited by 21,101
(2021) · A First Course in Statistical Programming with R · doi:10.1017/9781108993456.011 · Cited by 13,724
Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents
Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., & Colorni, A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/3477.484436 · Cited by 12,067
A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows
SPALART, P., & ALLMARAS, S. (1992) · 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.1992-439 · Cited by 9,499
(2006) · Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 · Cited by 9,008
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 8,560
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 · Cited by 8,070
Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method
van Leer, B. (1979) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1 · Cited by 7,142
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Xie, F., Ji, T., Zhu, Z., & Zheng, Y.
- Venue
- Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 373
- Pages
- 113485
- ISSN
- 0045-7825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3098407580
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113485
- The paper
- Zhang, X., Xie, F., Ji, T., Zhu, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Multi-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.