The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial hummingbird algorithm: A new bio-inspired optimizer with its engineering applications
Open accessAbstract
A new bio-inspired optimization algorithm called artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA) is proposed in this work to solve optimization problems. The AHA algorithm simulates the special flight skills and intelligent foraging strategies of hummingbirds in nature. Three kinds of flight skills utilized in foraging strategies, including axial, diagonal, and omnidirectional flights, are modeled. In addition, guided foraging, territorial foraging, and migrating foraging are implemented, and a visit table is constructed to model the memory function of hummingbirds for food sources. AHA is validated using two sets of numerical test functions, and the results are compared with those obtained from various algorithms. The comparisons demonstrate that AHA is more competitive than other meta-heuristic algorithms and determine high-quality solutions with fewer control parameters. Additionally, the performance of AHA is validated on ten challenging engineering design cases studies. The results show the superior effectiveness of AHA in terms of computational burden and solution precision compared with the existing optimization techniques in literature. The study also explores the application of AHA in hydropower operation design to further demonstrate its potential in practice. The source code of AHA is publicly available at https://seyedalimirjalili.com/aha and https://www.ma thworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/101133-artificial-hummingbird-algorithm?s_tid=srchtitle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
Holland, J. H. (1992) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66 · Cited by 5,764
Bio-inspired computing: Algorithms review, deep analysis, and the scope of applications
Darwish, A. (2018) · Future Computing and Informatics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.fcij.2018.06.001 · Cited by 302
Timing in Free-Living Rufous Hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus
Henderson, J., Hurly, T. A., Bateson, M., & Healy, S. D. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.054 · Cited by 140
Merrikh-Bayat, F. (2015) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.04.048 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Greylag Goose Optimization: Nature-inspired optimization algorithm
El-kenawy, E.-S. M., Khodadadi, N., Mirjalili, S., Abdelhamid, A. A., Eid, M. M., & Ibrahim, A. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122147 · Cited by 586
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, W., Wang, L., & Mirjalili, S.
- Venue
- Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 388
- Pages
- 114194
- ISSN
- 0045-7825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3211434935
- Cited by
- 987
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 53.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial hummingbird algorithm: A new bio-inspired optimizer with its engineering applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114194
- The paper
- Zhao, W., Wang, L., & Mirjalili, S. (2022). Artificial hummingbird algorithm: A new bio-inspired optimizer with its engineering applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.