Cited by 140Memory Processes and InfluencesAvian ecology and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Timing in Free-Living Rufous Hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus

Open access
Henderson, Jonathan, Hurly, T. Andrew, Bateson, Melissa, Healy, Susan D.·2006·Current Biology

Abstract

Animals organize their lives around circannual and circadian rhythms, but little is known of their use of much shorter intervals. In the laboratory, some animals can learn the specific duration (seconds or minutes) between periods of food access. It has been supposed that wild nectarivores, such as hummingbirds, might also learn short time intervals so as to avoid revisiting emptied flowers until the nectar has been replenished. We provided free-living, territorial rufous hummingbirds each with eight artificial flowers containing sucrose solution. Four flowers were refilled 10 min after the bird emptied them, and the other four were refilled 20 min after being emptied. Throughout the day, birds revisited the 10 min flowers significantly sooner than they revisited the 20 min flowers, and return visits to the flowers matched their refill schedules. Hummingbirds remembered the locations and timing of eight rewards, updating this information throughout the day. Not only is this the first time that this degree of timing ability has been shown in wild animals, but these hummingbirds also exhibit two of the fundamental aspects of episodic-like memory (where and when), the kind of memory for specific events often thought to be exclusive to humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.054

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderson, J., Hurly, T. A., Bateson, M., & Healy, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Healy, Susan D.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
512-515
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035096203
Cited by
140
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Rufous hummingbird, Selasphorus rufus, temporal memory, episodic-like memory, nectar foraging, artificial flowers, sucrose reward, spatial memory, nectarivores
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Feeding Behavior, Male, Memory, Periodicity, Time Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review