RETRACTED: The Ubiquitin Ligase Mul1 Induces Mitophagy in Skeletal Muscle in Response to Muscle-Wasting Stimuli
Open accessAbstract
Recent research reveals that dysfunction and subsequent loss of mitochondria (mitophagy) is a potent inducer of skeletal muscle wasting. However, the molecular mechanisms that govern the deregulation of mitochondrial function during muscle wasting are unclear. In this report, we show that different muscle-wasting stimuli upregulated mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (Mul1), through a mechanism involving FoxO1/3 transcription factors. Overexpression of Mul1 in skeletal muscles and myoblast cultures was sufficient for the induction of mitophagy. Consistently, Mul1 suppression not only protected against mitophagy but also partially rescued the muscle wasting observed in response to muscle-wasting stimuli. In addition, upregulation of Mul1, while increasing mitochondrial fission, resulted in ubiquitination and degradation of the mitochondrial fusion protein Mfn2. Collectively, these data explain the molecular basis for the loss of mitochondrial number during muscle wasting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FOXOs can act as critical regulators of mitochondrial homeostasis by regulating the expression of Mul1 and PINK1.
“Interestingly, FOXOs can also act as critical regulators of mitochondrial homeostasis through, at least, two additional means: (i) by regulating the expression of Mul1, a mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls Mfn2 degradation rates (Lokireddy et al, 2012), and (ii) by regulating the expression of the PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1), a key component of the mitophagy machinery (Mei et al, 2”
From Mitochondrial response to nutrient availability and its role in metabolic disease (2014) · cites this paper as Lokireddy et al, 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Lokireddy, S., Wijesoma, I. W., Teng, S., Bonala, S., Gluckman, P. D., McFarlane, C., Sharma, M., & Kambadur, R.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Venue
- Cell Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 613-624
- ISSN
- 1550-4131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2197107516
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 12.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education
- National Research Foundation
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- MUL1, mitophagy, skeletal muscle, muscle atrophy, E3 ubiquitin ligase, mitochondrial ubiquitination, retraction, data falsification
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Dexamethasone, DNA, Mitochondrial, Glucocorticoids, Mitochondria, Muscular Atrophy, Signal Transduction, Up-Regulation, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Mitochondrial Proteins, Myoblasts, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Mice, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial, Ubiquitination, Myostatin, Mitophagy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review