Cited by 266Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver physiology and pathologyLiver Diseases and Immunity

Macrophage MerTK Promotes Liver Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Open access
Cai, Bishuang, Dongiovanni, Paola, Corey, Kathleen E., Wang, Xiaobo, Shmarakov, Igor O., Zheng, Ze, Kasikara, Canan, Davra, Viralkumar +8 more·2020·Cell Metabolism

Abstract

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is emerging as a leading cause of chronic liver disease. However, therapeutic options are limited by incomplete understanding of the mechanisms of NASH fibrosis, which is mediated by activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). In humans, human genetic studies have shown that hypomorphic variations in MERTK, encoding the macrophage c-mer tyrosine kinase (MerTK) receptor, provide protection against liver fibrosis, but the mechanisms remain unknown. We now show that holo- or myeloid-specific Mertk targeting in NASH mice decreases liver fibrosis, congruent with the human genetic data. Furthermore, ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (ADAM17)-mediated MerTK cleavage in liver macrophages decreases during steatosis to NASH transition, and mice with a cleavage-resistant MerTK mutant have increased NASH fibrosis. Macrophage MerTK promotes an ERK-TGFβ1 pathway that activates HSCs and induces liver fibrosis. These data provide insights into the role of liver macrophages in NASH fibrosis and provide a plausible mechanism underlying MERTK as a genetic risk factor for NASH fibrosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deleting macrophage MerTK does not impair liver macrophage efferocytosis in FPC or HF-CDAA MASH models.

    “The finding with Mertk is consistent with our previous demonstration that liver macrophage efferocytosis in mice fed the MASH-inducing fructose-palmitate-cholesterol (FPC) diet for 16 weeks was not impaired by deletion of macrophage MerTK (33), and we now show similar results using the HD-CDAA MASH model (fig. S1C).”
  • ADAM17 cleaves MerTK to control macrophage inflammatory responses in steatotic livers, but this compensation fails in NASH possibly due to reduced availability of HSC-supplied vitamin A necessary to stimulate ADAM17.

    “ADAM17 cleaves MerTK to control macrophage inflammatory responses in steatotic livers, but this compensation fails in NASH – possibly due to reduced availability of HSC-supplied vitamin A (which is depleted when HSCs activate) that is necessary to stimulate ADAM17 (100).”

    From Hepatic Stellate Cell-Immune Interactions in NASH (2022) · cites this paper as [100]

  • Other macrophage-secreted cytokines that may promote HSC activation include PDGF, TNFα, and IL-1β.

    “Other macrophage-secreted cytokines that may promote HSC activation include PDGF, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and interleukin 1 beta ( IL-1β) (65-69).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 100 · Cited by 266

Authors
Cai, B., Dongiovanni, P., Corey, K. E., Wang, X., Shmarakov, I. O., Zheng, Z., Kasikara, C., Davra, V., Meroni, M., Chung, R. T., Rothlin, C. V., Schwabe, R. F., Blaner, W. S., Birge, R. B., Valenti, L., & Tabas, I.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Cai, Bishuang
  • Tabas, Ira
Venue
Cell Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
406-421.e7
ISSN
1550-4131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995961563
Cited by
266
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 1
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • American Society of Hematology (19CDA34660043)
  • American Liver Foundation
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (AI136715, DK078772, DK108370, T32HL007343)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5P30DK063608, RU-301)
  • National Institutes of Health (1K99DK115778)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • European Commission
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (16888)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, MERTK, hepatic stellate cells, hepatic macrophages, ADAM17, receptor cleavage, steatosis, genetic risk factors
MeSH terms
ADAM17 Protein, c-Mer Tyrosine Kinase, Animals, Cell Line, Chronic Disease, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Rats, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review