Cited by 870Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaInfection Control in Healthcare

What is antimicrobial stewardship?

Open access
Dyar, O.J., Huttner, B., Schouten, J., Pulcini, C.·2017·Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Abstract

Background The use of the term 'antimicrobial stewardship' has grown exponentially in recent years, typically referring to programmes and interventions that aim to optimize antimicrobial use. Although antimicrobial stewardship originated within human healthcare, it is increasingly applied in broader contexts including animal health and One Health. As the use of the term 'antimicrobial stewardship' becomes more common, it is important to consider what antimicrobial stewardship is, as well as what it is not. Aims To review the emergence and evolution of the term 'antimicrobial stewardship'. Sources We searched and reviewed existing literature and official documents, which mostly focused on antibiotics. We contacted the authors of the first publications that mentioned antimicrobial stewardship. Content We describe the historical background behind how antimicrobial stewardship came into use in clinical settings. We discuss challenges emerging from the varied descriptions of antimicrobial stewardship in the literature, including an over-emphasis on individual prescriptions, an under-emphasis on the societal implications of antimicrobial use, and language translation problems. Implications To help address these challenges, we suggest viewing antimicrobial stewardship as a strategy, a coherent set of actions which promote using antimicrobials responsibly. We stress the continuous need for 'responsible use' to be defined and translated into context-specific and time-specific actions. Furthermore, we present examples of actions that can be undertaken within antimicrobial stewardship across human and animal health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.026

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dyar, O. J., Huttner, B., Schouten, J., & Pulcini, C.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
Corresponding author
Dyar, O.J.
Venue
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
793-798
ISSN
1198-743X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751252352
Cited by
870
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 127 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
antimicrobial stewardship, responsible antimicrobial use, antibiotic prescribing, One Health, animal health, terminology and definitions
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Veterinary Drugs, Inappropriate Prescribing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review