Cited by 74AI in cancer detectionDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks

Open access
Bandeira Diniz, João Otávio, Bandeira Diniz, Pedro Henrique, Azevedo Valente, Thales Levi, Corrêa Silva, Aristófanes, de Paiva, Anselmo Cardoso, Gattass, Marcelo·2018·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Background and objective The processing of medical image is an important tool to assist in minimizing the degree of uncertainty of the specialist, while providing specialists with an additional source of detect and diagnosis information. Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer that affects the female population around the world. It is also the most deadly type of cancer among women. It is the second most common type of cancer among all others. The most common examination to diagnose breast cancer early is mammography. In the last decades, computational techniques have been developed with the purpose of automatically detecting structures that maybe associated with tumors in mammography examination. This work presents a computational methodology to automatically detection of mass regions in mammography by using a convolutional neural network.Methods The materials used in this work is the DDSM database. The method proposed consists of two phases: training phase and test phase. The training phase has 2 main steps: (1) create a model to classify breast tissue into dense and non-dense (2) create a model to classify regions of breast into mass and non-mass. The test phase has 7 step: (1) preprocessing; (2) registration; (3) segmentation; (4) first reduction of false positives; (5) preprocessing of regions segmented; (6) density tissue classification (7) second reduction of false positives where regions will be classified into mass and non-mass.Results The proposed method achieved 95.6% of accuracy in classify non-dense breasts tissue and 97,72% accuracy in classify dense breasts. To detect regions of mass in non-dense breast, the method achieved a sensitivity value of 91.5%, and specificity value of 90.7%, with 91% accuracy. To detect regions in dense breasts, our method achieved 90.4% of sensitivity and 96.4% of specificity, with accuracy of 94.8%.Conclusions According to the results achieved by CNN, we demonstrate the feasibility of using convolutional neural networks on medical image processing techniques for classification of breast tissue and mass detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.007

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning is increasingly used in medical imaging for tasks such as automated lesion detection, segmentation and registration to assist clinicians in disease diagnosis and surgical planning.

    “In medical imaging, deep learning is increasingly used for tasks such as automated lesion detection, segmentation and registration to assist clinicians in disease diagnosis and surgical planning.”

    From Deep Learning Strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Deep learning techniques have the potential to create new screening tools, predict diseases, improve diagnostic accuracy and accelerate clinical tasks, whilst also reducing costs and human error.

    “Deep learning techniques have the potential to create new screening tools, predict diseases, improve diagnostic accuracy and accelerate clinical tasks, whilst also reducing costs and human error [9–17].”

    From Deep Learning Strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. K. Deguchi , Registration techniques for partially covered image sequence, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Confernce on Pattern Recognition, 1986, pp. 1186-1189 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandeira Diniz, J. O., Bandeira Diniz, P. H., Azevedo Valente, T. L., Corrêa Silva, A., de Paiva, A. C., & Gattass, M.
Affiliations
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
156
Pages
191-207
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2784257876
Cited by
74
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
mammography, breast mass detection, breast density, convolutional neural networks, breast tissue classification, similarity index, DDSM database, false positive reduction, breast cancer screening
MeSH terms
Breast Density, Algorithms, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mammography, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review