The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The subjective experience of emotion: a fearful view
Open accessAbstract
We argue that subjective emotional experience, the feeling, is the essence of an emotion, and that objective manifestations in behavior and in body or brain physiology are, at best, indirect indicators of these inner experiences. As a result, the most direct way to assess conscious emotional feelings is through verbal self-report. This creates a methodological barrier to studies of conscious feelings in animals. While the behavioral and physiological responses are not 'emotions,' they contribute to emotions indirectly, and sometimes profoundly. Whether non-verbal animals have emotional experiences is a difficult, maybe impossible, question to answer in the positive or negative. But because behavioral and physiological responses are important contributors to emotions, and the circuits underlying these are highly conserved, studies of animals have an important role in understanding how emotions are expressed and regulated in the brain. Conflation of circuits that directly give rise to conscious emotional feelings with circuits that indirectly influences these conscious feelings has hampered progress in efforts to understand emotions, and also to understand and to develop treatments for emotional disorders. Recognition of differences in these circuits will allow research in animals to have a lasting impact on understanding of human emotions as research goes forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It has been argued that such different-level processes do not necessarily have to contribute to the same conscious emotional state (cf. LeDoux and Hofmann, 2018).”
From Aversive response to uncertainty as a mediator for the effect of a mindfulness intervention on symptoms of anxiety (2022) · cites this paper as LeDoux and Hofmann, 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In theoretical work on emotional consciousness, LeDoux and colleagues argue that lower-order responses can contribute to, but are not necessary for, the conscious experience of any emotional cognitive state (LeDoux & Brown, 2017;LeDoux & Hofmann, 2018).”
From Responding to uncertain threat: A potential mediator for the effect of mindfulness on anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as LeDoux & Hofmann, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The expression of the emotions in man and animals.
Darwin, C. D. (1872) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.1037/10001-000 · Cited by 12,120
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“It is most suitable for assessing the content of immediate experiences rather than remembered experiences [14,19] and is less useful for assessing the motivations underlying actions since these are often not consciously available and verbalizable [20,21].”
BackgroundDESCARTES' ERROR: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
Marg, E. (1995) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03988.x · Cited by 8,178
How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness
(Bud) Craig, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2555 · Cited by 6,657 · cited 1×
“Modern versions of this theory by Antonio Damasio [31,32] and A.D. Craig [33,34] have proposed that fearful and other emotional feelings are the result of activity in body sensing circuits in the neocortex (somato-sensory and/or insula areas) that represent body states, such as those triggered when…”
BackgroundCognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.
Russell, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145 · Cited by 6,113
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Danks, J. H., Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1985) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422516 · Cited by 4,452
Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions
Panksepp, J. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195096736.001.0001 · Cited by 4,428
Book Review: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Venkatesan, M., Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1986) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151491 · Cited by 4,364
(1996) · Cited by 3,692
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brain mechanisms of insomnia: new perspectives on causes and consequences
Someren, E. J. W. V. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00046.2019 · Cited by 578
LeDoux, J. E., & Daw, N. D. (2018) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.22 · Cited by 405
Self-citationEvolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation
Berridge, K. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01647 · Cited by 273
Space, Time, and Fear: Survival Computations along Defensive Circuits
Mobbs, D., Headley, D. B., Ding, W., & Dayan, P. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.016 · Cited by 281
Using anchor-based methods to determine the smallest effect size of interest
Anvari, F., & Lakens, D. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104159 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- LeDoux, J. E., & Hofmann, S. G.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- LeDoux, Joseph E
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 67-72
- ISSN
- 2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11444666
- OpenAlex
- W2770664338
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (203730/Z/16/Z, BB/N019814/1, 203139)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-13-015)
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Medical Research Council (G0902373, MR/L009013/1)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N019814/1)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT007257)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- subjective emotional experience, fear, emotional circuits, emotional disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
