The authoritarian-conservatism nexus
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conservative-rightist ideology is associated with valuing tradition, social order and maintenance of the status quo, whereas liberal-leftist ideology is associated with a push for egalitarian social change.
“Whereas conservative-rightist ideology is associated with valuing tradition, social order and maintenance of the status quo, liberal-leftist ideology is associated with a push for egalitarian social change.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [168]
Decades of research in political psychology demonstrate that those who embrace more conservative-rightist attitudes, identities and leaders are more authoritarian and social-dominance-oriented than those who embrace more liberal-leftist attitudes, identities and leaders.
“In addition, decades of research in political psychology demonstrate that those who embrace more conservative-rightist attitudes, identities and leaders are more authoritarian and social-dominance-oriented (that is, supportive of group-based hierarchies) than those who embrace more liberal-leftist attitudes, identities and leaders107,149,163–169.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [168]
There are meaningful ideological asymmetries in democratic tolerance and other key outcomes.
“Finally, when it comes to democratic tolerance and other key outcomes, there are meaningful ideological asymmetries that should not be ignored.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [168]
Liberal-leftists are more willing to challenge the societal status quo and push for egalitarian forms of social change, whereas conservative-rightists are more authoritarian and more protective of cultural traditions as well as longstanding social, economic and political institutions.
“Whereas liberal-leftists are more willing to challenge the societal status quo and push for egalitarian forms of social change, conservative-rightists are more authoritarian and more protective of cultural traditions as well as longstanding social, economic and political institutions101,107,149,166,168,172.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [168]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Nilsson, A., & Jost, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nilsson, Artur
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 34
- Pages
- 148-154
- ISSN
- 2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3019002217
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-12-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- authoritarian personality, political conservatism, right-wing ideology, authoritarianism, political ideology, The Authoritarian Personality, context sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review