Cited by 101Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and Values

The authoritarian-conservatism nexus

Nilsson, Artur, Jost, John T·2020·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conservative-rightist ideology is associated with valuing tradition, social order and maintenance of the status quo, whereas liberal-leftist ideology is associated with a push for egalitarian social change.

    “Whereas conservative-rightist ideology is associated with valuing tradition, social order and maintenance of the status quo, liberal-leftist ideology is associated with a push for egalitarian social change.”
  • Decades of research in political psychology demonstrate that those who embrace more conservative-rightist attitudes, identities and leaders are more authoritarian and social-dominance-oriented than those who embrace more liberal-leftist attitudes, identities and leaders.

    “In addition, decades of research in political psychology demonstrate that those who embrace more conservative-rightist attitudes, identities and leaders are more authoritarian and social-dominance-oriented (that is, supportive of group-based hierarchies) than those who embrace more liberal-leftist attitudes, identities and leaders107,149,163–169.”
  • There are meaningful ideological asymmetries in democratic tolerance and other key outcomes.

    “Finally, when it comes to democratic tolerance and other key outcomes, there are meaningful ideological asymmetries that should not be ignored.”
  • Liberal-leftists are more willing to challenge the societal status quo and push for egalitarian forms of social change, whereas conservative-rightists are more authoritarian and more protective of cultural traditions as well as longstanding social, economic and political institutions.

    “Whereas liberal-leftists are more willing to challenge the societal status quo and push for egalitarian forms of social change, conservative-rightists are more authoritarian and more protective of cultural traditions as well as longstanding social, economic and political institutions101,107,149,166,168,172.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 101

Authors
Nilsson, A., & Jost, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Nilsson, Artur
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
34
Pages
148-154
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3019002217
Cited by
101
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-12-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
authoritarian personality, political conservatism, right-wing ideology, authoritarianism, political ideology, The Authoritarian Personality, context sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review