Smartphone-assisted personalized diagnostic devices and wearable sensors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The challenge in colorimetric, fluorescence and luminescence sensors is the preparation of chemical detergents that indicate the presence of analytes by changing their optical properties.
“However, the challenge is the preparation of chemical detergents that indicate the presence of the analytes by changing their optical properties [74,277,278].”
From The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables (2022) · cites this paper as [278]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 159
- Authors
- Purohit, B., Kumar, A., Mahato, K., & Chandra, P.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Chandra, Pranjal
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 42-50
- ISSN
- 2468-4511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2974770708
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Keywords
- smartphone-based diagnostics, point-of-care devices, wearable sensors, portable biosensor, optical biosensors, electrochemical biosensor, health monitoring, personalized diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review