Cited by 191Electrostatics and Colloid InteractionsChemical and Physical StudiesMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

Hydration forces: Observations, explanations, expectations, questions

Parsegian, V.A., Zemb, T.·2011·Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cocis.2011.06.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parsegian, V. A., & Zemb, T.
Corresponding author
Parsegian, V.A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
618-624
ISSN
1359-0294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043735536
Cited by
191
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Chemical and Physical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
hydration forces, secondary hydration, water adsorption, solute redistribution, solvent structure, interfacial forces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review