Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 840

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for wastewater treatment

Martínez-Huitle, Carlos Alberto, Panizza, Marco·2018·Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

Abstract

This review supplies a current opinion about the most recent works, which have been carried out toward the electrochemical oxidation (EO) of organic pollutants for water treatment. In particular, the first section is focused on the direct EO or anodic oxidation, and the indirect EO by electrogenerated active chlorine, the most important mediated process. Meanwhile, the second section describes the use of promising cathodic processes as well as the recent progress of emerging photoassisted electrochemical treatments such as photoelectro-Fenton and solar electro-Fenton. The outlooks of these emerging processes for the upcoming future finally conclude this mini-review.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.07.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 840

Metadata

Authors
Martínez-Huitle, C. A., & Panizza, M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Electrochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
11
Pages
62-71
ISSN
2451-9103 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883965312
Cited by
840
References
1
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for wastewater treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.07.010
The paper
Martínez-Huitle, C. A., & Panizza, M. (2018). Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for wastewater treatment. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2018.07.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.