Risk Profile of Methylmercury in Seafood
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methylmercury can cause chronic toxic reactions after entering the human body, which may lead to great pain or organ failure.
“Methylmercury, as an organic compound, can cause chronic toxic reactions after entering the human body, which may lead to great pain or organ failure [91].”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Sevillano-Morales, J. S., Cejudo-Gómez, M., Ramírez-Ojeda, A. M., Cámara Martos, F., & Moreno-Rojas, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Córdoba (ES)
- ORCID
- Cejudo-Gómez, Manuel
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Food Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 53-60
- ISSN
- 2214-7993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2286154331
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Food Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- methylmercury, seafood contamination, fish consumption, dietary exposure, swordfish, predatory fish, pregnant women, children, exposure reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
