Cited by 151Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesMotor Control and Adaptation

The predictive value of the leveling off of within session performance for procedural memory consolidation

Hauptmann, Björn, Reinhart, Eva, Brandt, Stephan A., Karni, Avi·2005·Cognitive Brain Research

Abstract

In addition to performance gains accrued concurrently with a given training experience (within-session gains) robust, delayed (between-session) performance gains may slowly evolve in the absence of any additional practice in a variety of tasks. The latter is regarded as a behavioral manifestation of skill memory consolidation. It is not known, however, how much practice is necessary for the triggering of these consolidation effects. Here, using an enumeration task, we show that the triggering of delayed gains could be robustly predicted from each individual's performance curve. Delayed performance gains evolved consistently only when practice continued to the point at which within-session performance leveled off (saturation). No delayed gains were found when training was stopped before this individually determined point. Our results support the notion that the triggering of consolidation processes depends on the saturation of a distinct, early phase of learning rather than on the absolute number of task repetitions, and suggest the possibility that training and rehabilitation protocols could be optimized on an individual basis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies revealed greater benefits from sleep for strongly encoded memories or only in well-performing subjects.

    “On the other hand, other studies revealed greater benefits from sleep for strongly encoded memories (523, 1172) or only in well-performing subjects (1038, 1215).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [523]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 151

Authors
Hauptmann, B., Reinhart, E., Brandt, S. A., & Karni, A.
Affiliations
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Hauptmann, Björn
Venue
Cognitive Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
181-189
ISSN
0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088522894
Cited by
151
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
performance saturation, skill acquisition, individual differences in learning, training optimization, rehabilitation protocols
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Individuality, Learning, Male, Memory, Practice, Psychological, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review