Group creativity in children and adolescents
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior research shows that parents and peers bring rich scaffolding, emotional support, metacognitive prompting, good role models, and collaborative negotiation to the co-creation process.
“Prior research shows that parents and peers bring rich scaffolding, emotional support, metacognitive prompting, good role models, and collaborative negotiation to the co-creation process [14,26,39,43].”
From Child-AI Co-Creation: A Review of the Current Research Landscape and a Proposal for Six Design Considerations (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking together. A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11 (2nd ed.) . Birmingham: Imaginative Minds Ltd.
- Eaton, J., Collis, G., & Lewis, V. (1999). Evaluative explanations in children's narrative. Journal of Child Language, 26 , 700-719.
- Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion: Special Edition: Empathy, 14 (2), 131-149.
- Authors
- Oztop, P., & Gummerum, M.
- Affiliations
- Liverpool Hope University (GB)
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Oztop, Pinar
- Venue
- Cognitive Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 100923
- ISSN
- 0885-2014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3109807311
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Development (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Keywords
- team creativity, collaborative creativity, children, adolescents, developmental differences, social perspective taking, intersubjectivity, intrinsic motivation, creative writing, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
