The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation
Abstract
Over the past couple of decades, research has established that infants are sensitive to the predominant stress pattern of their native language. However, the degree to which the stress pattern shapes infants' language development has yet to be fully determined. Whether stress is merely a cue to help organize the patterns of speech or whether it is an important part of the representation of speech sound sequences has still to be explored. Building on research in the areas of infant speech perception and segmentation, we asked how several months of exposure to the target language shapes infants' speech processing biases with respect to lexical stress. We hypothesize that infants represent stressed and unstressed syllables differently, and employed analyses of child-directed speech to show how this change to the representational landscape results in better distribution-based word segmentation as well as an advantage for stress-initial syllable sequences. A series of experiments then tested 9- and 7-month-old infants on their ability to use lexical stress without any other cues present to parse sequences from an artificial language. We found that infants adopted a stress-initial syllable strategy and that they appear to encode stress information as part of their proto-lexical representations. Together, the results of these studies suggest that stress information in the ambient language not only shapes how statistics are calculated over the speech input, but that it is also encoded in the representations of parsed speech sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0032 · Cited by 1,405
Infants' Preference for the Predominant Stress Patterns of English Words
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131210 · Cited by 981
Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00690.x · Cited by 675
PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684216 · Cited by 484
Self-citationWords in a sea of sounds: The output of infant statistical learning
Saffran, J. R. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00132-9 · Cited by 352
Cited by
Motherese in Interaction: At the Cross-Road of Emotion and Cognition? (A Systematic Review)
Saint-Georges, C., Chetouani, M., Cassel, R., Apicella, F., Mahdhaoui, A., Muratori, F., Laznik, M.-C., & Cohen, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078103 · Cited by 343
Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning
Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. H. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.003 · Cited by 263
The extraction and integration framework: A two-process account of statistical learning
Thiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., & Hufnagle, D. G. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030801 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H., & Christiansen, M. H.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-262
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000812031
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.005
- The paper
- Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Stress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.