The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Harnessing the wandering mind: The role of perceptual load
Open accessAbstract
Perceptual load is a key determinant of distraction by task-irrelevant stimuli (e.g., Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75-82). Here we establish the role of perceptual load in determining an internal form of distraction by task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs or "mind-wandering"). Four experiments demonstrated reduced frequency of TUTs with high compared to low perceptual load in a visual-search task. Alternative accounts in terms of increased demands on responses, verbal working memory or motivation were ruled out and clear effects of load were found for unintentional TUTs. Individual differences in load effects on internal (TUTs) and external (response-competition) distractors were correlated. These results suggest that exhausting attentional capacity in task-relevant processing under high perceptual load can reduce processing of task-irrelevant information from external and internal sources alike.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946 · Cited by 2,067
Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.339 · Cited by 1,812 · cited 2×
“Indeed, previous research has indicated that increasing perceptual load in this task does not interfere with working memory task performance, nor does it interact with the effects of working memory load on distraction (e.g., Lavie et al., 2004; Logan, 1978).”
Self-citationPerceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213897 · Cited by 870 · cited 2×
“This fundamental issue has stimulated much research over the past four decades (e.g., see Kahneman and Treisman (1984), Lavie and Tsal (1994), Lavie (1995) for reviews) and a major determinant of focused attention that has been highlighted is the level of perceptual load in a task.”
Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources
Teasdale, J. D., Dritschel, B. H., Taylor, M. J., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Baddeley, A. D. (1995) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197257 · Cited by 341
The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces
Lavie, N., Ro, T., & Russell, C. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03453 · Cited by 313
Self-citationINFORMATION THEORY AND STIMULUS‐INDEPENDENT THOUGHT
ANTROBUS, J. S. (1968) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1968.tb01157.x · Cited by 240
Cited by
The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331 · Cited by 1,685
Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load
Lavie, N. (2010) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721410370295 · Cited by 673
Self-citationMcVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018298 · Cited by 622
Thomson, D. R., Besner, D., & Smilek, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614556681 · Cited by 460
Smallwood, J., & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00441 · Cited by 433
Metadata
- Authors
- Forster, S., & Lavie, N.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-355
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019490284
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harnessing the wandering mind: The role of perceptual load. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.006
- The paper
- Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2009). Harnessing the wandering mind: The role of perceptual load. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
