Cited by 1,685Mind wandering and attentionCognitive Functions and MemoryFlow Experience in Various Fields

The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness

Open access
Smallwood, Jonathan, Schooler, Jonathan W.·2015·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Conscious experience is fluid; it rarely remains on one topic for an extended period without deviation. Its dynamic nature is illustrated by the experience of mind wandering, in which attention switches from a current task to unrelated thoughts and feelings. Studies exploring the phenomenology of mind wandering highlight the importance of its content and relation to meta-cognition in determining its functional outcomes. Examination of the information-processing demands of the mind-wandering state suggests that it involves perceptual decoupling to escape the constraints of the moment, its content arises from episodic and affective processes, and its regulation relies on executive control. Mind wandering also involves a complex balance of costs and benefits: Its association with various kinds of error underlines its cost, whereas its relationship to creativity and future planning suggest its potential value. Although essential to the stream of consciousness, various strategies may minimize the downsides of mind wandering while maintaining its productive aspects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike exposure to often invisible environmental factors such as air pollution, we can potentially 're-live' our experiences of the natural world in memory, for instance during periods of 'mind wandering', and derive benefits from these recollections independent of those experienced in situ.

    “We note, moreover, that unlike exposure to often invisible environmental factors such as air pollution, we can potentially ‘re-live’ our experiences of the natural world in memory, for instance during periods of ‘mind wandering’, and derive benefits from these recollections independent of those experienced in situ41.”

    From Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing (2019) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Andrews-Hanna, Arnaud D'Argembeau, and David Stawarczyk for providing their data. The writing of this review was supported by grant R305A110277 from the US Office of Education to both authors and grant 24329 from the John Templeton Foundation to the second author. LITERATURE CITED
  2. Christoff K, Gordon AM, Smallwood J, Smith R, Schooler JW. 2009. Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:8719-24
  3. Cohen JD, Schooler JW. 1997. Scientific Approaches to Consciousness. New York: Psychol. Press
  4. KCR, Christoff K. 2014. Metacognitive facilitation of spontaneous thought processes: when metacogni- tion helps the wandering mind find its way. In The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition, ed. SM Fleming, CD Frith, pp. 293-319. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
  5. Franklin MS, Mrazek MD, Anderson CL, Smallwood J, Kingstone A, Schooler JW. 2014. Tracking distraction: the relationship between mind-wandering, meta-awareness, and ADHD symptomatology. J. Atten. Disord. In press
  6. Janoff-Bulman R. 1992. Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: Free Press
  7. Mooneyham BW, Schooler JW. 2013. The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67:11-18
  8. Szpunar KK, Khan NY, Schacter DL. 2013a. Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:6313-17
  9. Varela F, Thompson E. 2003. Neural synchrony and the unity of mind: a neurophenomenological perspective. In The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration, and Dissociation, ed. A Cleeremans, pp. 266-87. New York: Oxford Univ. Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2015-01-03
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
487-518
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2117194251
Cited by
1,685
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
Keywords
mind wandering, stream of consciousness, attentional shift, metacognition, episodic memory, emotional processing, executive function, creativity, future planning
MeSH terms
Attention, Awareness, Consciousness, Humans, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review