The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 11,822
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,101
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Wimmer, H. (1983) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 · Cited by 6,305
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,221
An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1062872 · Cited by 4,561
Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth about False Belief
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304 · Cited by 4,476
The Moral Judgment Of The Child
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009681 · Cited by 4,372
Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Weaver, H. (1969) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,845
Cited by
The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm
Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317698288 · Cited by 659
Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment
Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M. T., Fitzpatrick, S., Gurven, M., Henrich, J., Kanovsky, M., Kushnick, G., Pisor, A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1522070113 · Cited by 339
The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology
Jara-Ettinger, J., Gweon, H., Schulz, L. E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.011 · Cited by 328
Sherman, L. J., Rice, K., & Cassidy, J. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.06.001 · Cited by 102
Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy: How Preschoolers Perceive and Judge Moral Hypocrites
Myślińska Szarek, K., & Baryła, W. (2025) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13580 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamlin, J. K.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 451-474
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133028040
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 143
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004
- The paper
- Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
