Cited by 102Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Infant capacities related to building internal working models of attachment figures: A theoretical and empirical review

Open access
Sherman, Laura J., Rice, Katherine, Cassidy, Jude·2015·Developmental Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dr.2015.06.001

Cites

265 of 265 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, L. J., Rice, K., & Cassidy, J.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Cassidy, Jude
Venue
Developmental Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
37
Pages
109-141
ISSN
0273-2297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W902683300
Cited by
102
References
261
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Developmental Review (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Janet Johnson Summer Fellowship
  • Ann G. Wylie Dissertation Fellowship
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
internal working models, infant attachment, attachment figures, infant cognition, social cognition, attachment theory, social-emotional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review