Cited by 100Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production

Open access
Lee, Eun-Kyung, Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, Watson, Duane G.·2013·Cognition

Abstract

It is generally assumed that language production proceeds incrementally, with chunks of linguistic structure planned ahead of speech. Extensive research has examined the scope of language production and suggests that the size of planned chunks varies across contexts (Ferreira & Swets, 2002; Wagner & Jescheniak, 2010). By contrast, relatively little is known about the structure of advance planning, specifically whether planning proceeds incrementally according to the surface structure of the utterance, or whether speakers plan according to the hierarchical relationships between utterance elements. In two experiments, we examine the structure and scope of lexical planning in language production using a picture description task. Analyses of speech onset times and word durations show that speakers engage in hierarchical planning such that structurally dependent lexical items are planned together and that hierarchical planning occurs for both direct and indirect dependencies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.007

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wundt, W. (1900). Völkerpsychologie: EineUntersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte (Vol. 1). Die Sprache [Language]. Leipzig: Kroner-Engelmann.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 100

Metadata

Authors
Lee, E.-K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Eun-Kyung
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
129
Issue
3
Pages
544-562
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059694360
Cited by
100
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (R01DC008774)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
language production, hierarchical planning, utterance structure, surface structure, structural dependence, picture description task, word duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Speech, Speech Production Measurement, Verbal Behavior, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review