The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production
Open accessAbstract
It is generally assumed that language production proceeds incrementally, with chunks of linguistic structure planned ahead of speech. Extensive research has examined the scope of language production and suggests that the size of planned chunks varies across contexts (Ferreira & Swets, 2002; Wagner & Jescheniak, 2010). By contrast, relatively little is known about the structure of advance planning, specifically whether planning proceeds incrementally according to the surface structure of the utterance, or whether speakers plan according to the hierarchical relationships between utterance elements. In two experiments, we examine the structure and scope of lexical planning in language production using a picture description task. Analyses of speech onset times and word durations show that speakers engage in hierarchical planning such that structurally dependent lexical items are planned together and that hierarchical planning occurs for both direct and indirect dependencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Even under those circumstances, participants often choose not to plan the entire utterance but only a first chunk, often corresponding to one or two words, before beginning to speak.”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2013
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This strategy can lead to disfluencies or pauses after the first chunk”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer
(2011) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31821473f7 · Cited by 8,010
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,017
Praat : doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]
Boersma, P. (2011) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,110
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. N. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,036
The problem of serial order in behavior
Lashley, K. S. (1951) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 2,734
Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R
Dévière, E. (2009) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664760802366783 · Cited by 2,347
Analyzing linguistic data : a practical introduction to statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · Cited by 2,069
The Analysis of Sentence Production
Garrett, M. F. (1975) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60270-4 · Cited by 1,018
(2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-369374-7.x5000-7 · Cited by 959
What the Eyes Say About Speaking
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00255 · Cited by 881
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wundt, W. (1900). Völkerpsychologie: EineUntersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte (Vol. 1). Die Sprache [Language]. Leipzig: Kroner-Engelmann.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal
Norcliffe, E., Konopka, A. E., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1006238 · Cited by 101
The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon
Anna Papafragou, A., Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.001.0001 · Cited by 82
Human-like Controllable Image Captioning with Verb-specific Semantic Roles
Chen, L., Jiang, Z., Xiao, J., & Liu, W. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01657 · Cited by 73
Reading during the composition of multi-sentence texts: an eye-movement study
Torrance, M., Johansson, R., Johansson, V., & Wengelin, Å. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0683-8 · Cited by 56
A sentence to remember: Instructed language switching in sentence production
Declerck, M., & Philipp, A. M. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.006 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, E.-K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Eun-Kyung
- ORCID
- Lee, Eun-Kyung
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 544-562
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3909534
- OpenAlex
- W2059694360
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (R01DC008774)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- language production, hierarchical planning, utterance structure, surface structure, structural dependence, picture description task, word duration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Speech, Speech Production Measurement, Verbal Behavior, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review