Cited by 125Free Will and AgencyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

I control therefore I do: Judgments of agency influence action selection

Karsh, N., Eitam, B.·2015·Cognition

Abstract

Our sense of being agents, that is of willingly controlling both our own bodies and the external environment is ubiquitous if thin. Empirical and theoretical work on this 'sense of agency' has documented motivational, cognitive and neural influences on implicit (out of awareness) and explicit (conscious) judgments of agency. For example, fluency of action selection processes has been recently shown to affect judgments of one's degree of control over an external event. However, it is an open question whether and how such judgments of agency act as input to other processes. In this study we demonstrate that the opposite relationship between action selection and judgment of agency also exists. Specifically, we show that manipulating one's objective control over the environment influences both the speed and the frequency of performing an action associated with that control. This pattern bears a striking resemblance to the effect that tangible rewards have on action selection and suggests that positive control feedback is rewarding to the organism, consequently affecting action selection. If further corroborated this 'reward from control' may explain everyday addictions such as prolonged engagement in arcade games and pathological behaviors, such as stereotypy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans and other animals prefer an option leading to a choice over an option that does not, even if the choice option results in greater effort or work, suggesting an inherent reward with the exercise of control.

    “Studies with both humans (Tiger, Hanley, & Hernandez, 2006) and other animals (Catania, 1975;Catania & Sagvolden, 1980;Voss & Homzie, 1970) have shown that both prefer an option leading to a choice than an option that does not, even if this option results in greater effort or worksuggesting the existence of an inherent reward with the exercise of control (Karsh & Eitam, 2015;Leotti & Delgado, 2011”
  • Autonomy-supportive conditions facilitate performance and enhance perceptions of competence, self-efficacy, and sense of agency.

    “Potential consequences of autonomy-supportive conditions include facilitation of performance (Karsh & Eitam, 2015;Legault & Inzlicht, 2013) as well as the opportunity to enhance perceptions of competence, self-efficacy, and sense of agency (Chambon & Haggard, 2012).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 125

Authors
Karsh, N., & Eitam, B.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
138
Pages
122-131
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016300526
Cited by
125
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
sense of agency, action selection, fluency, control feedback, addiction, stereotypy, arcade games
MeSH terms
Adult, Awareness, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Reward, Unconscious, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review