Cited by 121Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionWilliams Syndrome Research

A sound advantage: Increased auditory capacity in autism

Open access
Remington, Anna, Fairnie, Jake·2017·Cognition

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has an intriguing auditory processing profile. Individuals show enhanced pitch discrimination, yet often find seemingly innocuous sounds distressing. This study used two behavioural experiments to examine whether an increased capacity for processing sounds in ASD could underlie both the difficulties and enhanced abilities found in the auditory domain. Autistic and non-autistic young adults performed a set of auditory detection and identification tasks designed to tax processing capacity and establish the extent of perceptual capacity in each population. Tasks were constructed to highlight both the benefits and disadvantages of increased capacity. Autistic people were better at detecting additional unexpected and expected sounds (increased distraction and superior performance respectively). This suggests that they have increased auditory perceptual capacity relative to non-autistic people. This increased capacity may offer an explanation for the auditory superiorities seen in autism (e.g. heightened pitch detection). Somewhat counter-intuitively, this same 'skill' could result in the sensory overload that is often reported - which subsequently can interfere with social communication. Reframing autistic perceptual processing in terms of increased capacity, rather than a filtering deficit or inability to maintain focus, increases our understanding of this complex condition, and has important practical implications that could be used to develop intervention programs to minimise the distress that is often seen in response to sensory stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Remington, A., & Fairnie, J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Remington, Anna
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
166
Pages
459-465
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610340431
Cited by
121
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nature
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, auditory processing, pitch discrimination, sensory overload, auditory detection, auditory identification, distraction, social communication
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Auditory Perception, Autistic Disorder, Female, Hearing, Humans, Male, Pitch Discrimination, Reaction Time, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review