Cited by 403Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Autism and Hearing Loss

Rosenhall, Ulf, Nordin, Viviann, Sandström, Mikael, Ahlsén, Gunilla, Gillberg, Christopher·1999·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

A group of 199 children and adolescents (153 boys, 46 girls) with autistic disorder was audiologically evaluated. Mild to moderate hearing loss was diagnosed in 7.9% and unilateral hearing loss in 1.6% of those who could be tested appropriately. Pronounced to profound bilateral hearing loss or deafness was diagnosed in 3.5% of all cases, representing a prevalence considerably above that in the general population and comparable to the prevalence found in populations with mental retardation. Hearing deficits in autism occurred at similar rates at all levels of intellectual functioning, so it does not appear that the covariation with intellectual impairment per se can account for all of the variance of hearing deficit in autism. Hyperacusis was common, affecting 18.0% of the autism group and 0% in an age-matched nonautism comparison group. In addition, the rate of serous otitis media (23.5%) and related conductive hearing loss (18.3%) appeared to be increased in autistic disorder. The study emphasizes the need for auditory evaluation of individuals with autism in order to refer those with pronounced to profound hearing loss for aural habilitation and to follow those with mild to moderate hearing loss because of the risk of deterioration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023022709710

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenhall, U., Nordin, V., Sandström, M., Ahlsén, G., & Gillberg, C.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Örebro University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Rosenhall, Ulf
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
1999-10
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
349-357
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2121122075
Cited by
403
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, hearing loss, hyperacusis, otitis media with effusion, conductive hearing loss, profound hearing loss, prevalence, intellectual functioning, hearing assessment, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Deafness, Female, Hearing Loss, Conductive, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Hearing Tests, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Otitis Media with Effusion, Hyperacusis, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review