CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social network size can influence linguistic malleability and the propagation of linguistic change

Lev-Ari, Shiri·2018·Cognition
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Babel, 2012, Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation, Journal of Phonetics, 40, 177, 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001 · DOI
  2. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012, April). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 519–528). ACM. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barabási, 1999, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286, 509, 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bock, 1986, Syntactic persistence in language production, Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355, 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bock, 2000, The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177, 10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Branigan, 2000, Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue, Cognition, 75, B13, 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5 · DOI
  7. Brennan, 1996, Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1482
  8. Chang, 2013, A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language, Journal of Phonetics, 41, 520, 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.006 · DOI
  9. Chang, 2006, Becoming syntactic, Psychological Review, 113, 234, 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chartrand, 1999, The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893, 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Coupland, 1980, Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting, Language and Society, 9, 1, 10.1017/S0047404500007752 · DOI
  12. Fagyal, 2010, Centers and peripheries: Network roles in language change, Lingua, 120, 2061, 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.001 · DOI
  13. Goldinger, 1998, Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access, Psychological Review, 105, 251, 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Granovetter, 1973, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360, 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gregory, 1996, A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1231, 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231 · DOI
  16. Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A. & Swart, P. J. (2008). Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In G. Varoquaux, T. Vaught & J. Millman (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), (Pasadena, CA USA) (pp. 11–15). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Haun, 2012, Majority-biased transmission in chimpanzees and human children, but not orangutans, Current Biology, 22, 727, 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.006 · DOI
  18. Herrmann, 2013, Stick to the script: The effect of witnessing multiple actors on children’s imitation, Cognition, 129, 536, 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hilpert, 2008, The English comparative–language structure and language use, English Language and Linguistics, 12, 395, 10.1017/S1360674308002694 · DOI
  20. Jaeger, 2013, Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience, Cognition, 127, 57, 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013 · DOI
  21. Lev-Ari, 2016, How the size of our social network influences our semantic skills, Cognitive Science, 40, 2050, 10.1111/cogs.12317 · DOI
  22. Lev-Ari, 2017, Talking to more people leads to having more malleable linguistic representations, PLoS One, 12, e0183593, 10.1371/journal.pone.0183593 · DOI
  23. Lev-Ari, S (2018). The influence of social network size on speech perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1747021817739865. · DOI
  24. Milroy, 1985, Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation, Journal of Linguistics, 21, 339, 10.1017/S0022226700010306 · DOI
  25. Mühlenbernd, 2012, Signaling conventions: Who learns what where and when in a social network, Proceedings of EvoLang IX, 242, 10.1142/9789814401500_0032 · DOI
  26. Nettle, 1999, Using Social Impact Theory to simulate language change, Lingua, 118, 95, 10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00046-1 · DOI
  27. Pardo, 2012, Phonetic convergence in college roommates, Journal of Phonetics, 40, 190, 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001 · DOI
  28. Pols, 1973, Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 50 male speakers, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1093, 10.1121/1.1913429 · DOI
  29. Posner, 1968, On the genesis of abstract ideas, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353, 10.1037/h0025953 · DOI
  30. Rost, 2010, Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning, Infancy, 15, 608, 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00033.x · DOI
  31. Street, 1982, Evaluation of noncontent speech accommodation, Language and Communication, 2, 13, 10.1016/0271-5309(82)90032-5 · DOI
  32. Weimann, 1982, On the importance of marginality: One more step into the two-step flow of communication, American Sociological Review, 764, 10.2307/2095212 · DOI
  33. Yildirim, 2016, Talker-specificity and adaptation in quantifier interpretation, Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 128, 10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Lev-Ari, S.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
176
Pages
31-39
ISSN
0010-0277
DOI
10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.003
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review