The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development
(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620669 · Cited by 1,082
Cited by
Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005 · Cited by 731
Self-citationAn integrated theory of whole number and fractions development
Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001 · Cited by 706
The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades
Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004 · Cited by 471
Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children
Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (2009) · Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/ddrr.46 · Cited by 349
BARNER, D., CHOW, K., & YANG, S. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- LECORRE, M., VANDEWALLE, G., BRANNON, E., & CAREY, S.
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-169
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146102800
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.002
- The paper
- LECORRE, M., VANDEWALLE, G., BRANNON, E., & CAREY, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
