The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Green sample preparation strategies for organic/inorganic compounds in environmental samples
Open accessAbstract
A rigorous evaluation of environmental contamination requires constant innovation in analytical approaches to gain early identification and accurate quantification of every substance able to compromise health and well-being, particularly when trace analysis of organic and inorganic contaminants, and their species, in complex environmental samples is required. The analytical process comprises several steps; above all, sample treatment, involving isolation of analytes, purification of extracts, and preconcentration often constitute the most time- and labor-consuming part. This review provides an overview of sample treatment procedures applied for the analysis of organic and inorganic compounds in environmental samples in recent years. The current state of the art is emphasized on those techniques and approaches that have already demonstrated their sufficient analytical performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The primary objective of the analytical methods field is to develop reliable and efficient methods for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of different compounds [12,13].”
From Liquid-phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerutti, S., Pacheco, P. H., Gil, R., & Martinez, L. D.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Martinez, Luis Dante
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 76-86
- ISSN
- 2452-2236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2971625804
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universidad Nacional de San Luis (PROICO 2-1816)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PUE 2016-0113)
- Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2014-2411, PICT 2016-1776)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Keywords
- green sample preparation, environmental pollutants, organic pollutants, inorganic contaminants, trace analysis, sample treatment, extract purification, preconcentration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green sample preparation strategies for organic/inorganic compounds in environmental samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.08.007
- The paper
- Cerutti, S., Pacheco, P. H., Gil, R., & Martinez, L. D. (2019). Green sample preparation strategies for organic/inorganic compounds in environmental samples. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.08.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
