CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementCultural and Historical StudiesEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Slowing the fast fashion industry: An all-round perspective

Open access
Centobelli, Piera, Abbate, Stefano, Nadeem, Simon Peter, Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo·2022·Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry
DOI 10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100684
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The fashion sector contributes significantly to global environmental pollution. Clothing manufacturing and transportation produce a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions. Recent research has shown that nowadays, the number of consumers that are more willing to pay higher prices for clothes with high sustainability content is growing. This paper provides a broad framework of current trends in the fashion, textile, and garment industry, highlighting circular and slow fashion values that companies and policymakers should address in the coming years to maintain their competitiveness in the market and promote sustainable development. The EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles is expected to help fashion enterprises achieve more circular, sustainable, and resilient value chains. Notably, encouraging natural and recycled textiles, design for reuse and recycling, second-hand retail and repair, and product-as-a-service models, particularly for items with high turnover rates, have been highlighted as critical factors for reducing the fashion industry's environmental implications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100684

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Shirvanimoghaddam, 2020, vol. 718
  2. 2022, vol. 2030, 2022

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–173 of 173

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Centobelli, P., Abbate, S., Nadeem, S. P., & Garza-Reyes, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • University of Derby (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
38
Pages
100684
ISSN
2452-2236 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100684
OpenAlex
W4297405369
Cited by
173
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cultural and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
slow fashion, fast fashion, circular economy, sustainable textiles, environmental impact of fashion, greenhouse gas emissions, recycled textiles, natural textiles, second-hand retail, garment repair, product-as-a-service, sustainable value chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review